Back to @wordpressdotcom's profile

WordPress.com engagement report

@wordpressdotcom - 1.5M followers on X

Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 1.5M followers
Per impression
0.444%
3.8K views on a typical post
Reach
0.26%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
17
interactions (median)
Saved
0.039%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.27/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 17 interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 13% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.8K times each, and 0.444% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.264% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 73% carry an image or video, 46% are part of a thread and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 505 interactions, about 30x its own typical post.

Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

WordPress.com's engagement rate beats 13% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 28% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, WordPress.com sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,078 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.694%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,078 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,460 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.694%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video73% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link50% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 73% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 50% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 243 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 14, 202630x their median

    Drop your website. We want to see what you’ve been shipping. 👇

    18912295956K viewsView on X
  • Nov 21, 202518x their median

    In honor of our 20th anniversary, we wanted to share some of the most iconic https://t.co/eRvNKWaWaZ websites we’ve come across. Check out the thread below, and comment with a https://t.co/eRvNKWaWaZ site YOU think is worth giving a shoutout! 🧵

    10214453352K viewsView on X
  • Oct 22, 202612x their median

    Yesterday the PHP project released security updates addressing two critical "PHP2Shell" vulnerabilities. If your site is hosted on @wordpressdotcom, @WordPressVIP, @wpcloudofficial, @Pressable, @tumblr, or any Automattic infrastructure, you’re already protected. Managing PHP yourself? Here’s what to do: https://t.co/YWhXDWKYLV

    143447321K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20265.2x their median

    My current favourite WordPress dev stack: WordPress Studio + Claude Code (desktop). It’s kinda miraculous how quickly you can go from an idea to something actually working beautifully in WordPress. https://t.co/6mtwPfpy5q

    6712826.7K viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 20264.8x their median

    What’s something you’re building on @WordPress that you’re excited about? 👇

    36338422K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20264.4x their median

    Introducing the https://t.co/SzOtj1tpyW Education Program, launched today at #WCUS 🎓 Teachers can give every student a professional @WordPress site with plugins, themes, tools, a free domain, and hosting that renews each year they're enrolled. https://t.co/8QQ67TdngY https://t.co/BFUVnKMbel

    47203512K viewsView on X
  • Jul 9, 20263.1x their median

    The internet belongs to all of us. Today, we prove it. Code for the People, a documentary short about the open web from the people who built it, is now available. Stream it for free. For freedom. For the future. https://t.co/eYoscoZmJS

    4326128.5K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 20264.0x their median

    At a crossroads with Wordpress and Ai Web development Wordpress is great for hand off and overall efficiency But for many brochure and marketing sites, it lacks in time to concept and WP is bloated (comment, user, databases etc) I’ve built over 1,500 Wordpress sites and believe it was the holy grail But with hosting, plugins and a lot of bloat in this ecosystem On the flip side, AI development is very nuanced and takes a considerable time of prompting and coaching to get right It’s bloated in a different way

    3622829.6K viewsView on X
  • Jul 13, 20263.0x their median

    Contributor Day. Real-world WordPress projects. Four conference tracks covering AI, technical skills, business, and the basics. Explore what’s waiting for you at WordCamp US 2026 in Phoenix, August 16–19: https://t.co/RpbeCWijxI https://t.co/P0gIYzinYj

    3124527.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20263.4x their median

    AI can build a website in minutes, but it still can't decide what ships. That's the takeaway from Automattic for Agencies' latest webinar on AI and @WordPress, led by AI Product Lead @ronnieburt. https://t.co/kZFXR9eSnG

    485406.5K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 17 interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 13% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.8K times each, and 0.444% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.264% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 73% carry an image or video, 46% are part of a thread and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 505 interactions, about 30x its own typical post.

What is WordPress.com's engagement rate on X?
WordPress.com (@wordpressdotcom) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 26 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,453,871 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, WordPress.com sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,078 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @wordpressdotcom have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 13% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @wordpressdotcom post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going