Whats Up Tucson engagement report
@whatsuptucson - 175K followers on X
Measured over 60 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 18, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 7 interactions against 175K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 60 original posts, its engagement rate beats 15% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.7K times each, and 0.188% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.12% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 60 posts sampled, 20% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 573 interactions, about 82x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #airquality, #arizonaweather, #azwx.
Measured over 60 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 18, 2026. Recurring tags: #airquality, #arizonaweather, #azwx.
Compared with accounts its own size
Whats Up Tucson's engagement rate beats 15% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 11% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.004%, Whats Up Tucson sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.147% |
| 75th percentile | 0.698% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.8% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 20% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 15% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 20% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 15% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 117 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 16, 202682x their median
“Liberty biberty emu on the loose in marana” https://t.co/SSGJZaFabh
- Oct 15, 202633x their median
Oct 15, 2026 Cancer update: Still have it 😂 Had a visit to a cardiologist this morning to get cleared for the next cancer related surgery that is coming in mid-November. All good, I was cleared. The cardiologist did tell me to start taking a baby aspirin daily. Hopefully that will make me look younger. Or I might start getting urges to suck my thumb. Thank you's to those that have thrown a few bucks my way. I have approx $10k worth of bills so far that I'm responsible for. I'll be making payments for a while on some, was able to pay one off thanks to the $3k you've donated. Thank you. It's difficult and expensive attempting to stay alive.
- Sep 17, 202613x their median
Tucson Blvd and Drexel https://t.co/hXb3Je3qrL
- Oct 17, 202611x their median
Valencia and I-10 https://t.co/uKZxc4Mw4b
- Sep 17, 202611x their median
I live at encantado saguaro national they’re currently doing a raid at an apt there’s a bunch of cops and they’re on the megaphone asking the person to come out or they will use deadly force. Does anyone have any info on what’s going on?
- Oct 17, 20269.6x their median
“Hi, I just wanted to let people know that my friend was driving and at a stoplight someone got out of their car wearing a costume and holding a fake knife and walked up to my friends car to try and scare them”
- Oct 17, 20265.7x their median
❤️ Thank you to Robert and to Kyle for the cancer treatment donations. (I'm fighting colon cancer) It's expensive trying to stay alive. I appreciate the help. Next up: Two days of surgery, Nov 9 and Nov 10 at TMC Total donated (so far): $3,310 https://t.co/O0QqmQINkm
- Sep 18, 20265.0x their median
🔥 Fire near Speedway and Main https://t.co/Ck13RWvqPB
- Sep 17, 20264.4x their median
Crash involving Sun Tran bus at Speedway and Campbell https://t.co/fevowut0oT
- Oct 16, 20263.7x their median
⚡️ Power outage: Rita Ranch and Vail area. Wind event related. 2,680 TEP customers X-ing in the dark
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 7 interactions against 175K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 60 original posts, its engagement rate beats 15% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.7K times each, and 0.188% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.12% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 60 posts sampled, 20% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 573 interactions, about 82x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #airquality, #arizonaweather, #azwx.
- What is Whats Up Tucson's engagement rate on X?
- Whats Up Tucson (@whatsuptucson) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 60 original posts from the last 30 days against 175,394 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.004%, Whats Up Tucson sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @whatsuptucson have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 15% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @whatsuptucson post?
- Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.53 posts per day across the measured window.