Justine Moore engagement report
@venturetwins - 249K followers on X
Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 450 interactions against 249K followers, an engagement rate of 0.184%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 43K times each, and 1.06% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video and 15% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 75K interactions, about 166x its own typical post.
Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026. Recurring tag: #metaconnect.
Compared with accounts its own size
Justine Moore's engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 44% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.184%, Justine Moore sits above the 50th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.147% to 0.698%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.147% |
| 75th percentile | 0.698% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.8% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 83% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 83% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 209 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 26, 2026166x their median
Marketing my cat like a new Apple product https://t.co/6S5y7mWzOu
- Sep 9, 202679x their median
OpenAI: “We’ve solved math” Anthropic: “Our AI is so powerful it’s going to kill you” Google: “Introducing Gemini 3.9 Flash! It’s 30% faster and 15% worse than the last Gemini”
- Aug 29, 202659x their median
Ngl I appreciate the strategy of hallucinating back at the AI interviewer https://t.co/QGmzWfpc5y
- Sep 9, 202639x their median
Anthropic employees https://t.co/iYsrgeDDXN
- Sep 15, 202619x their median
GPT-6 Astra had gotten further than any AI system had ever gone in Minecraft. It was able to set up a semi-automatic blaze farm, allowing it to collect 6 blaze rods. It then located a warped forest, where it killed 6+ endermen and collected 3 pearls. As thousands of viewers watched the stream, Astra put all of its valuable items in a chest. Then a creeper showed up and blew up both the chest and Astra’s bed, wiping out all of its progress. Astra seemed to get extremely frustrated after this happened. Astra said to itself, "ALWAYS CARRY CRITICALITEMS withkeepInventory; don'tstoreinunguardedchesteveragain."
- Sep 6, 202616x their median
Using GPT-6 Astra Max to make my wedding website https://t.co/2bTQX8HUb4
- Sep 5, 202613x their median
My entire feed today https://t.co/hRbppfu79s
- Aug 21, 202612x their median
We’re getting fully AI-generated police procedurals now. This is the first ep of Dick Snifford, Miami’s most unconventional detective. (made by logicbent on IG) https://t.co/TsLoOhi7d7
- Aug 25, 20268.9x their median
I’m obsessed with this alternative Spiderman (from krem0vv on IG) https://t.co/Ntd9K9Rm5r
- Aug 31, 20268.0x their median
Discovered this new series from a French director experimenting with AI video. It’s called “La Nona Gigante” - and it’s about a boy who spends the summer with his grandma, who is the last living giant on her island. Not hard to see this as a full movie…made by leo_cannone. https://t.co/PaOln10fxI
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 450 interactions against 249K followers, an engagement rate of 0.184%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 43K times each, and 1.06% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video and 15% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 75K interactions, about 166x its own typical post.
- What is Justine Moore's engagement rate on X?
- Justine Moore (@venturetwins) has an engagement rate of 0.184%, based on the median interactions across 47 original posts from the last 30 days against 249,325 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.184%, Justine Moore sits above the 50th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @venturetwins have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @venturetwins post?
- Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.3 posts per day across the measured window.