Back to @thedanaedavis's profile

Danae Davis engagement report

@thedanaedavis - 879K followers on X

Measured over 46 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.011%
of 879K followers
Per impression
0.282%
34K views on a typical post
Reach
4.04%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
96
interactions (median)
Saved
0.019%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.83/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
04:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 96 interactions against 879K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 46 original posts, its engagement rate beats 35% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 34K times each, and 0.282% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.86% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 67K interactions, about 697x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #htx, #za.

Measured over 46 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026. Recurring tags: #htx, #za.

Compared with accounts its own size

Danae Davis's engagement rate beats 35% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 20% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.011%, Danae Davis sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,146 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.694%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,146 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,455 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.694%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 04:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video4% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 4% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 62 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 7, 2026697x their median

    My sister’s baby daddy was just looking too good last night😩 Am i wrong for letting him fuck me in every room?πŸ’¦ https://t.co/QVrZVYAen3

    62K4.7K12124754K viewsView on X
  • May 10, 2026223x their median

    When y’all haven’t seen each other https://t.co/fK56mJMYeD

    18K2.8K774401.6M viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026109x their median

    If I tell you to pull up, wyd?πŸ‘€πŸ’¦πŸ₯œ https://t.co/56WLRoWerD

    9.6K813998100K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202684x their median

    Do you ever wonder how many people jerked off to you? Like i kinda want a counter

    6.9K82890277200K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202649x their median

    the reason we are having this many STD outbreaks is because these men are DL I keep telling yall

    3.1K5714196041.5M viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 202640x their median

    Y’all be knowing about the gfs & still willing to play side bitchπŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜­

    2.4K1.1K49292948K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202634x their median

    my intentions will always be pure i have no desire to be a shitty person

    2.1K1.1K45386K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 202616x their median

    what sign fucked you the best πŸ˜‚πŸ«£

    64533261599245K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202616x their median

    For my own sanity I really gotta stop getting my hopes up

    1.1K40651420K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202616x their median

    sucking dick is slavery

    814231983722.1M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#htx#za

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 96 interactions against 879K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 46 original posts, its engagement rate beats 35% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 34K times each, and 0.282% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.86% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 67K interactions, about 697x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #htx, #za.

What is Danae Davis's engagement rate on X?
Danae Davis (@thedanaedavis) has an engagement rate of 0.011%, based on the median interactions across 46 original posts from the last 30 days against 879,455 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.011%, Danae Davis sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,146 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @thedanaedavis have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 35% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @thedanaedavis post?
Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.83 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going