Back to @terrellowens's profile

Terrell Owens engagement report

@terrellowens - 1.3M followers on X

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.003%
of 1.3M followers
Per impression
0.21%
20K views on a typical post
Reach
1.56%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
41
interactions (median)
Saved
0.003%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.13/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 41 interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 21% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 0.21% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.56% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 35% carry an image or video and 60% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 53K interactions, about 1281x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #terrellowens, #justicefornolanwells, #screamingasmith.

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026. Recurring tags: #terrellowens, #justicefornolanwells, #screamingasmith.

Compared with accounts its own size

Terrell Owens's engagement rate beats 21% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 15% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.003%, Terrell Owens sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,078 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.694%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,078 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,460 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.694%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video35% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link60% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 35% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 60% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 110 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 27, 20261281x their median

    Dear Football Fans, this is a safe space. Do you think this is roughing the passer? https://t.co/h0T39nnJWz

    19K91931K1.8K4.9M viewsView on X
  • Jun 7, 20261123x their median

    HEARTBREAKING: #NFL HCs and GMs LAUGHED AT Darren Sproles when he measured in at the combine and was only 5-foot-6 and weighed in at 170 pounds. Sproles called his dad: “They laughed at me” His Dad replied: “You know what to do” Sproles became a legend. https://t.co/Y2zCtkk49y

    33K2.6K2801702.1M viewsView on X
  • Feb 13, 20261229x their median

    The NBA has fined the Utah Jazz $500,000 and the Indiana Pacers $100,000 related to the management of their rosters for recent games.

    28K1.6K1.8K1.5K5.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 2026568x their median

    Ocho Vs T.O Who yall got ? 😭😭😭😭 https://t.co/wEUuJD8U38

    21K1.7K330190225K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026294x their median

    Cam Newton pulled the race-baiting card, stating Black athletes are forced onto podcasts and private platforms versus white QBs getting grandfathered into national headline TV spots. It’s very disrespectful to actual hard workers in the media industry. https://t.co/yFd4mkvdGk

    10K590986178547K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 202668x their median

    Evidently this girl is so good at Basketball they started Guarding her when the plane landed. 🤣😂. She could score 50 against Lebron. 😂🤣 https://t.co/RclOF2iS30

    6.9K72020458381K viewsView on X
  • May 26, 2026244x their median

    You’re a bonehead. So him being late to meetings make him not a man. Stop! Everyone has been late. So what?!! You were a high draft pick, I’m sure there are that say you didn’t live up to your draft status!! You must be a Trumper too?!! 🤔 https://t.co/R2LkKh9RHG

    5.7K5601.4K79380K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 2026167x their median

    THROWBACK: When Terrell Owens went from having one of the worst games of his career to making one of the most iconic game-winning catches in #NFL playoff history. @terrellowens the greatest ever 🐐 https://t.co/csGKi2HPs3

    6.3K38614542351K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 2026133x their median

    PRIME TERRELL OWENS WAS UNSTOPPABLE IN AN OPEN-FIELD SPRINT. THIS HIGHLIGHT REEL IS RIDICULOUS TO WATCH. 😱😱😱 https://t.co/WXGIqIA138

    4.6K5761081301.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 2026101x their median

    Pippen was the true leader on those championship teams no matter how many points Jordan ball hogged to score. https://t.co/bOn3p4dNU2

    3.5K4302063894K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#terrellowens#justicefornolanwells#screamingasmith#stephenasmith#teamto

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 41 interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 21% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 0.21% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.56% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 35% carry an image or video and 60% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 53K interactions, about 1281x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #terrellowens, #justicefornolanwells, #screamingasmith.

What is Terrell Owens's engagement rate on X?
Terrell Owens (@terrellowens) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,252,001 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.003%, Terrell Owens sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,078 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @terrellowens have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 21% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @terrellowens post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going