Back to @sigmargabriel's profile

Sigmar Gabriel engagement report

@sigmargabriel - 262K followers on X

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.422%
of 262K followers
Per impression
2.85%
39K views on a typical post
Reach
14.8%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.1K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.028%
11 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.13/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Tuesday

Early reading. We have captured 3 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 262K followers, an engagement rate of 0.422%. Posts are seen about 39K times each, and 2.85% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 14.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.13 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 33% are part of a thread and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 12x its own typical post. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.422%, Sigmar Gabriel sits above the 50th percentile of the 215,837 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.148% to 0.702%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.148%
p750.702%
p902.62%
p9982.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 215,837 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 21,730 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.148%
75th percentile0.702%
90th percentile2.62%
99th percentile82.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link33% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 33% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 241 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 2, 202512x their median

    70 years ago, thousands of US soldiers gave their lives to liberate Germany from the Nazis. Today, US Secretary of State supports a party that tolerates and promotes neo-Nazis. @secrubio apparently doesn't realize how much he is trampling on the honor of US veterans of W-War II.

    9.1K1.8K2.3K300619K viewsView on X
  • Jun 19, 20255.8x their median

    Typisch deutsch: statt über die wirklich schwierige Lage & den drohenden Einsatz von Atomwaffen durch den Iran zu diskutieren, beschäftigen wir uns mit Stilfragen: darf der @bundeskanzler das Wort „Drecksarbeit“ benutzen? Klare Worte sind besser als unverständlicheSchwiemeleien,

    4.9K4421.0K101247K viewsView on X
  • Feb 28, 20254.5x their median

    Unter Trump werden die USA zur „schurkischen Supermacht“. Diese Prognose des konservativen (!) amerikanischen Publizisten ist zur bitteren Realität geworden. @realDonaldTrump und @JDVance beleidigen Präs. Selenski vor laufender Kamera. Schlimmer würde es Putin auch nicht treiben.

    3.3K3271.2K66115K viewsView on X
  • Mar 18, 20264.4x their median

    Was für ein schwerer Fehler der Bundesregierung:KEINE deutsche Hilfe in der #StrassevonHormuz. Natürlich wollen wir nicht in diesen Krieg. Aber auch unsere Handelsschiffe brauchen Schutz. Vor allem aber hätten wir den Golfstaaten mal zeigen können, dass wir Ihnen zur Seite stehen

    3.3K397977136209K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20263.9x their median

    Die @linkspartei hat in Berlin bei Antisemiten und Islamisten nach Wählern gefischt und auch nicht vor kriminellen Clanstrukturen Halt gemacht. Weniger Polizei und Verfassungsschutz zu fordern, passt ins Bild. Diese Partei darf den Hasspredigern nicht die Türen ins Rathaus öffnen

    3.2K36469178168K viewsView on X
  • Mar 27, 20253.8x their median

    Die richtige Antwort auf Trumps Autozölle? Keine „Gegenzölle“ der EU, sondern das Angebot, alle Zölle auf Autos auf 0 zu setzen. Wenn die EU 10 % Zölle auf US Autos erhebt und die USA umgekehrt nur 2 %, hat Trump Recht. Also alle Zölle weg statt gegenseitigen Handelskrieg.

    3.5K29636378174K viewsView on X
  • Jun 11, 20253.8x their median

    Man darf die Entspannungspolitik Willy Brandts nicht zum Appeasement gegenüber Moskau verdrehen. Brandts Wehretat betrug 4 % des BIP - doppelt so hoch wie heute! Er wusste: militärische Stärke und die klare Verankerung in der NATO bildeten die Voraussetzung für Verhandlungen.

    3.4K43427653111K viewsView on X
  • May 6, 20252.7x their median

    Den Kanzler nicht im ersten Wahlgang zu wählen, ist weit mehr als eine Eselei, wo ein paar Frustrierte aus CDU/CSU und SPD ihr Mütchen kühlen. Sondern mir ihrer Selbstbezogenheit helfen sie nur den Feinden unserer Demokratie. Einziger Gewinner: die AfD.

    2.0K13680541118K viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 20252.6x their median

    Dass Deutschland den Aufruf von 25 Staaten zumeist aus der EU zum Stopp des #Gaza Kriegs nicht unterschrieben hat, ist furchtbar und beschämend. Die Opfer dieses Krieges sind längst nicht mehr die Terroristen der Hamas, sondern Frauen, Kinder und die Zivilbevölkerung.

    1.9K32159857121K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20252.1x their median

    Mit welchen Argumenten kann man eigentlich die Entscheidung des Bundeskanzlers @_FriedrichMerz kritisieren, keine Waffen an Israel zu liefern, die in einem völkerrechtswidrigen Krieg zur Vertreibung der Palästinenser aus Gaza eingesetzt werden können?

    1.2K12093185327K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 262K followers, an engagement rate of 0.422%. Posts are seen about 39K times each, and 2.85% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 14.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.13 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 33% are part of a thread and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 12x its own typical post. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Sigmar Gabriel's engagement rate on X?
Sigmar Gabriel (@sigmargabriel) has an engagement rate of 0.422%, based on the median interactions across 3 original posts from the last 30 days against 261,656 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.422%, Sigmar Gabriel sits above the 50th percentile of the 215,837 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @sigmargabriel have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @sigmargabriel post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going