Back to @shwood's profile

Brian Brushwood engagement report

@shwood - 1.4M followers on X

Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 1.4M followers
Per impression
0.074%
9.5K views on a typical post
Reach
0.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
7
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.13/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 7 interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 7% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 9.5K times each, and 0.074% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.699% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 31% carry an image or video and 77% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 169K interactions, about 24085x its own typical post.

Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Brian Brushwood's engagement rate beats 7% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 4% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, Brian Brushwood sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,146 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.694%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,146 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,455 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.694%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video31% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link77% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 31% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 77% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 70 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 23, 202624085x their median

    What the actual fuck have I just read https://t.co/fxSuAZwoNM

    155K8.7K1.9K3.3K12M viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20262152x their median

    we got hit with a crazy scam attempt someone signed up for our inference and did a video call with our sales person confirming intent to spend $400,000 over the next year and asked for increased rate limits our sales person felt like something was off so he looked up the company - found a bunch of videos of the CEO and it looked and sounded like the same person he talked to so he figured it was real but we started looking deeper the email they had been talking to us from was a lookalike domain that was registered 4 days ago. all the traffic they were sending looked bizarre and came from foreign IPs emailed them for more info to see what they'd say. of course they hit us with the "i'm about to get on a plane, can't do anything right now, please move forward" messaged the real CEO on instagram and yeah he had no idea what we were talking about, the scammer was deepfaking him be careful out there, things are getting crazy

    14K665276117937K viewsView on X
  • Jun 25, 2026172x their median

    It's hard to believe Arclight Hollywood has been abandoned for 6 years. 14 screen multiplex on Sunset Blvd just sitting empty frozen in March 2020... It was the highest grossing theater in USA. So strange. @ArcLightCinemas https://t.co/agkD2GWN1F

    2.4K2626754241K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202668x their median

    The amount of money Americans lost in scams hit a record high of almost $16 billion in 2025. And while federal efforts seek to address the problem, thousands of Americans scammed every day never get their money back. https://t.co/zJBVRg0ufr

    2751315217163K viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 202630x their median

    At a diner, and I asked for soy sauce for my steak and eggs. I got a blank stare like I was the first person to suggest such a thing. Does nobody else do soy sauce on steak and eggs? Is that not a thing? Because it’s amazing.

    1247162536K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202628x their median

    I just finished the second episode of Widows Bay. Holy shit this show rules.

    165420475K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 202626x their median

    Welcome to Modern Rogue World Headquarters! Make yourself at home. This guy did. https://t.co/p69cvMoi9S

    139434431K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 202618x their median

    The cancellation of season 2 of Wonder Man is an incredible encapsulation of all the lessons we learned from season 1 of Wonder Man. Maybe it's secretly viral marketing for it.

    108413143K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 202614x their median

    There's $70 Billion of unclaimed property in the USA. Money owed to people (you), but it's money that's juuust enough of a pain in the ass to collect that it just sits there. 1/

    78414245K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 202613x their median

    https://t.co/ZyGg0BFQlF https://t.co/8YezCMhgtw

    67191219K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 7 interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 7% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 9.5K times each, and 0.074% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.699% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 31% carry an image or video and 77% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 169K interactions, about 24085x its own typical post.

What is Brian Brushwood's engagement rate on X?
Brian Brushwood (@shwood) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 26 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,356,532 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, Brian Brushwood sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,146 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @shwood have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 7% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @shwood post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going