Back to @sexyrickliang's profile

RickLiang engagement report

@sexyrickliang - 161K followers on X

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.029%
of 161K followers
Per impression
0.154%
30K views on a typical post
Reach
19.0%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
47
interactions (median)
Saved
0.01%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.57/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 47 interactions against 161K followers, an engagement rate of 0.029%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 34% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 30K times each, and 0.154% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 19.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 35% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 218 interactions, about 6.2x its own typical post.

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

RickLiang's engagement rate beats 34% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 8% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.029%, RickLiang sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.147%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,098 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,393 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video35% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 35% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 28 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Mar 29, 20266.2x their median

    自玩X以来,与所有的乌烟瘴气平行而立,不参与、不投入、不共情、不合作。曾有那么段时间在这一片小领地,心无旁骛地沉浸其中,与你们分享,Makes me feel alive,可好景不长,且只能戛然而止,未来有很多不确定,毫无疑问的是,我终将卷土重来。

    1976150477K viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 20263.2x their median

    想起昨晚的比赛还是热泪盈眶,今晚给大家发福利😈

    90023083K viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 20262.5x their median

    过气网黄尚能饭否?

    69018083K viewsView on X
  • Jun 27, 20262.5x their median

    上海体育场馆里一个现象就是,篮球足球都是小众运动了,娘娘腔运动盛行,比如羽毛球(个人观点)。更让人绝望的是,野球场也没人较真的好好打球了,养生局令我味如嚼蜡。上海曾经红极一时的球场关门的关门,开着的也都半死不活,篮球的黄金时代也随着我的青春已然逝去。

    571290117K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 20262.3x their median

    是谁最喜欢的小猫咪? #丝足 #美女 #丝袜 #stockings #legs https://t.co/nA3UiRVk6S

    180611161K viewsView on X
  • May 18, 20262.3x their median

    泰国许多外国人中国人定居,吃的花样多,热带水果多,佛教国家人人友善,消费低,房子便宜,躺平理想之地……人生就是来享受的,不是来折磨自己的。有人说泰国国力不强,经济不强,但泰国强弱和你有什么关系?

    681110103K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20262.2x their median

    破16w庆祝下?

    66011073K viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 20261.7x their median

    宝宝 贴贴啊 #丝足 #美女 #丝袜 #stockings #legs https://t.co/inE2wyqTWI

    411171135K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20261.6x their median

    关于hyrox,罄竹难书,那些成绩、排名,毫无意义,一场彻头彻尾的闹剧,我只觉得提什么体育精神,以及把hyrox当成个东西在练的人,都很可笑。

    5104036K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20261.5x their median

    人通常会把对他人的注意力放在“对自己基因不满意”的地方,尤其是异性。头发稀少的人会特别关注他人的发量和发际线,鼻梁塌的会留意对方的鼻骨,矮的会对身高特别挑剔,久而久之,就对塑造个人的审美倾向产生潜在的影响。实际上每个人都有对自己身体不满意的地方,即便是看上去十分完美的人类样本。

    5102068K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 47 interactions against 161K followers, an engagement rate of 0.029%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 34% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 30K times each, and 0.154% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 19.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 35% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 218 interactions, about 6.2x its own typical post.

What is RickLiang's engagement rate on X?
RickLiang (@sexyrickliang) has an engagement rate of 0.029%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 160,647 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.029%, RickLiang sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @sexyrickliang have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 34% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @sexyrickliang post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going