Back to @schadjoe's profile

Joe Schad engagement report

@schadjoe - 244K followers on X

Measured over 86 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.035%
of 244K followers
Per impression
0.465%
18K views on a typical post
Reach
7.52%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
86
interactions (median)
Saved
0.011%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
5.8/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 86 interactions against 244K followers, an engagement rate of 0.035%. Measured over 86 original posts, its engagement rate beats 41% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 0.465% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.52% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 86 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video and 16% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 64K interactions, about 739x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cowboys, #cowboysnation, #goducks.

Measured over 86 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026. Recurring tags: #cowboys, #cowboysnation, #goducks.

Compared with accounts its own size

Joe Schad's engagement rate beats 41% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 25% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.035%, Joe Schad sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.147%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,004 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,390 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video65% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link16% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 65% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 16% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 150 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 26, 2026739x their median

    The perfect ending for Justin Verlander. His daughter runs out to the mound and he walks off with his family. Feels like a movie. https://t.co/C1XzJmG2VY

    55K5.8K8801.5K5.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026124x their median

    "I'm not going to tell you who is playing in the game. I'm not going to tell you who is starting, what package we have in, what play we're running. I'm not going to tell you any of that. So we can make it great and have a great press conference, or we can make it uncomfortable. I'm not going to tell you because what you know, the Cowboys know, and every other team knows. That's not in the competitive interest of our football team. I think you can respect that." - John Harbaugh

    8.7K5926497163.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 2026117x their median

    What a photo from Kiyoshi Mio - IMAGN. https://t.co/jOlrZSV5VI

    9.6K4145724906K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 202697x their median

    A close up look at the field at Maracanã Stadium. #Cowboys #CowboysNation https://t.co/tNKgkqB9md

    6.2K3567011.1K10M viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 202692x their median

    Deion Sanders on Travis Hunter's usage: "I have no idea what’s going on. I know who he was and who he is right now." (via @CBSNewsColorado) https://t.co/Ag62anpFbG

    7.6K137155481.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202689x their median

    An annual tradition unlike any other. After a summer of speaking to and seeing everyone, my Super Bowl pick is officially in. The season is a marathon. Ups and downs. See you-- and these two teams-- in LA in February, folks. @OmahaProd @ESPNNFL @JasonMcCourty @danorlovsky7 https://t.co/M4RlXAZ2LQ

    7.0K26434070674K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 202675x their median

    Somebody said Arch prospect profile is like Daniel Jones and I agree. You see the physical tools but something is just missing

    6.1K2519584342K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 202646x their median

    This is different. #Toney https://t.co/YWggsIZpFp

    3.4K460273250K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202643x their median

    The Rams arrived in Melbourne at 7 am local time. Since they are staying on west coast time, they will probably go to sleep around 3-5 pm local time, wake up around midnight to 2 am, play a game at 10:30 am and then jump on a plane back right after. https://t.co/HCYeGV5oeg

    3.4K103135411.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 202640x their median

    Dylan Larkin expanded his list, which is now: TBL: $1.9M COL: $0.4M WSH: $0.1M DAL: $0.4M MIN: $0.9M VGK: -$8.8M FLA: -$0.9M Teams’ cap space per PuckPedia. #LGRW

    3.2K8613446389K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#cowboys#cowboysnation#goducks#hailstate#lgrw

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 86 interactions against 244K followers, an engagement rate of 0.035%. Measured over 86 original posts, its engagement rate beats 41% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 0.465% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.52% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 86 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video and 16% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 64K interactions, about 739x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cowboys, #cowboysnation, #goducks.

What is Joe Schad's engagement rate on X?
Joe Schad (@schadjoe) has an engagement rate of 0.035%, based on the median interactions across 86 original posts from the last 30 days against 244,285 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.035%, Joe Schad sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @schadjoe have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 41% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @schadjoe post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going