Back to @s_k_k's profile

山本四角 engagement report

@s_k_k - 164K followers on X

Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.017%
of 164K followers
Per impression
0.336%
8.2K views on a typical post
Reach
4.99%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
28
interactions (median)
Saved
0.006%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.93/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 28 interactions against 164K followers, an engagement rate of 0.017%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.2K times each, and 0.336% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.00% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video, 10% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.6K interactions, about 201x its own typical post.

Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026. Recurring tag: #古代魔法はあまりにも.

Compared with accounts its own size

山本四角's engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 19% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.017%, 山本四角 sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,098 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,393 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video33% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link7% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 33% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 7% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 56 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 16, 2026201x their median

    魔の喫茶店(1/2) https://t.co/7q1G0455e8

    4.9K700114244K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 2026113x their median

    マッピングの癖 https://t.co/sYdpThRGl3

    2.8K338915170K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 2026102x their median

    お祭りでキスするまんが (0/8) #喫茶ニュー魔王城 https://t.co/ZWZCnhngtM

    2.3K508168301K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202339x their median

    竜の真実を求めひた走れ!! 小娘と獣人の漫画『イズミと竜の図鑑』連載中です。 ●ComicWalker https://t.co/GD8KJVy5QC ●ニコニコ漫画 https://t.co/SB8LkyBbjv ●月刊コミックフラッパー https://t.co/XpdaD46WIK https://t.co/tCq58HvwmA

    648348127896K viewsView on X
  • Oct 24, 202634x their median

    特典的なやつ https://t.co/ixplPAgGVY

    854834011K viewsView on X
  • Oct 22, 202619x their median

    リファレンスと実際のイラスト https://t.co/9EUoz1Tpyx

    488412111K viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 202619x their median

    特典的なやつ https://t.co/35KeHnp7dZ

    46948109.8K viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 202615x their median

    ひさびさの迷宮SNS https://t.co/bjzH3h9UEy

    368411014K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202614x their median

    ありえん着替え方で初期フォームに戻るの好き好きドラゴン https://t.co/5VoAZmyiKO

    346351011K viewsView on X
  • Oct 23, 20269.0x their median

    ゲームで育ってゲームを好きになった大人が今社会の中心になっているというのなら、ケモナーの貴様らにも一刻も早く偉くなってもらわなければならない

    200483013K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#古代魔法はあまりにも

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 28 interactions against 164K followers, an engagement rate of 0.017%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.2K times each, and 0.336% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.00% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video, 10% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.6K interactions, about 201x its own typical post.

What is 山本四角's engagement rate on X?
山本四角 (@s_k_k) has an engagement rate of 0.017%, based on the median interactions across 30 original posts from the last 30 days against 163,855 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.017%, 山本四角 sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @s_k_k have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @s_k_k post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going