Back to @richardpbacon's profile

richard bacon engagement report

@richardpbacon - 1.1M followers on X

Measured over 52 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.12%
of 1.1M followers
Per impression
0.6%
226K views on a typical post
Reach
20.0%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.4K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.064%
146 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
8.8/day
active 103% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 1.4K interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.12%. Measured over 52 original posts, its engagement rate beats 73% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 226K times each, and 0.6% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 20.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 8.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 52 posts sampled, 73% carry an image or video and 31% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 201K interactions, about 158x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #snluk, #newsnight, #celebritytraitors.

Measured over 52 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026. Recurring tags: #snluk, #newsnight, #celebritytraitors.

Compared with accounts its own size

richard bacon's engagement rate beats 73% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 34% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.12%, richard bacon sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,146 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.694%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,146 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,455 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.694%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video73% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link31% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 73% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 31% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 296 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 16, 2026158x their median

    A internet entrando em colapso descobrindo que a Kristen Bell realmente sabe cantar na vida real e não era autotune kkkk O pior são as crianças no estádio tentando entender porque uma mulher de meia idade tem a voz da Anna do Frozen https://t.co/30Jg10uIRD

    188K11K9571.5K18M viewsView on X
  • Oct 24, 202678x their median

    SNL UK doing a Nollywood version of Wicked with Cynthia Erivo is the funniest thing they’ve done sorry https://t.co/lZvwfeJJwV

    86K11K4202.6K5.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 202657x their median

    This comment on Finneas’s instagram 🥹 https://t.co/URYvPtPums

    68K3.9K81862.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 202634x their median

    Let's be clear- It wasn't our security services that thwarted the terrorist bombing of RAF Fairford, they knew fuck all about it. A local farmer, on her way home from a party, saw the vans and called the police. Mass murder was averted through blind luck. We are not safe under this Labour government.

    37K5.0K7911141.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202631x their median

    I swear Tina and Amy wrote this with a little personal rage behind it, and somehow that makes the whole thing even funnier. https://t.co/Z1N0zLFRpQ

    37K2.2K1853282.8M viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 202623x their median

    Me: ‘Don’t make it obvious but there’s an incredibly fit girl at the bar’ My mate: https://t.co/Uzz5mjp4uO

    29K1.1K12375953K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 202622x their median

    I know we all joke about Leo being a degenerate (he is) but he really is the greatest when it comes to this acting shit https://t.co/2nczJpLoet

    27K88511240213M viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 202620x their median

    Another rare funny moment from the modern SNL. Im not gonna rag on them. You either like it or you have actual taste. 🤣🤣🤣 They do accidently put out decent skits once in a while, I'll give that much. 🤣🤣🤣 https://t.co/3bovi9TAXm

    23K2.3K215242440K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202547x their median

    Phase two of my government starts today. https://t.co/Ll2Wd6PnOa

    4.5K68013K2.6K8.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 202612x their median

    YOU CAN SEE EVERYTHING, a documentary by Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim, featuring Elizabeth Holmes. See for yourself only in theaters October 16. Select theaters on sale now at https://t.co/DZ1E68DQfQ, nationwide tickets available October 1. https://t.co/6jbp713LqR

    14K1.0K2046237.9M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#snluk#newsnight#celebritytraitors#duchessofsussex#johnsimpson

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.4K interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.12%. Measured over 52 original posts, its engagement rate beats 73% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 226K times each, and 0.6% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 20.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 8.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 52 posts sampled, 73% carry an image or video and 31% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 201K interactions, about 158x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #snluk, #newsnight, #celebritytraitors.

What is richard bacon's engagement rate on X?
richard bacon (@richardpbacon) has an engagement rate of 0.12%, based on the median interactions across 52 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,130,755 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.12%, richard bacon sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,146 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @richardpbacon have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 73% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @richardpbacon post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 8.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going