Back to @qtcinderella's profile

QTCinderella engagement report

@qtcinderella - 608K followers on X

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.588%
of 608K followers
Per impression
1.66%
216K views on a typical post
Reach
35.5%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3.6K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.035%
75 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.8/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 3.6K interactions against 608K followers, an engagement rate of 0.588%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 93% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 216K times each, and 1.66% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 35.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.8 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 60K interactions, about 17x its own typical post.

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

QTCinderella's engagement rate beats 93% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 61% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.588%, QTCinderella sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,805 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.146% to 0.697%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.697%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,805 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,448 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.697%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video33% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link11% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 33% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 11% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 82 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 6, 202617x their median

    I grew up in a dark place. I love my family and I’m grateful for the lessons I learned but I suffered a lot along the way. When I was in high school I saw a Craigslist ad of a farm looking to get rid of some puppies. I drove 2 hours in my beat up Acura and with my money saved from my retail job I bought my best friend. I named him Swift. He became a light that I never knew I could have. I didn’t know what true love was before him. I had never had the chance to witness it. But I quickly learned the definition because of him. He held me thru breakups and hard ships. He held me when I lost my mom. He held me when I lost my identity. He held me when I couldn’t get up. Some struggles I’ve faced over the years made me wonder if I should be alive or if I should let myself go. But I always had a tether holding me. My beautiful boy who loved me unconditionally in a way that kept me here. Some days I didn’t even have it in me to get out of bed and Swift would remind me it’s time to get up. I have never loved anyone or anything the way I love Swift. For 15 years he was the light of my life. The reason for my world. And now he’s not here. I don’t know how I’m going to survive. For 15 years he was the first thing I saw in the morning and the last thing I saw before falling asleep. When we would go for walks he wouldn’t watch the path he would turn back and constantly make sure I was still with him. What he didn’t know is I needed him as much as he needed me. To say I’m heart broken is an understatement. I’m shattered down to my core. The only consistent love I’ve ever had in my life is gone. I would move mountains for Swift, and I promise I fucking tried. I’ve lost a part of my soul with him. I wish I could do more. I wish I got more. I would give anything in the world right now to have him next to me. I’ve experienced a lot of grief in my life but this is a rare kind. I’ve loved Swift more than I loved myself on numerous occasions. I would do it all again. Every appointment, every cancelled plan, every adjustment in my schedule to make sure he got what he needed. I love that dog more than I love life itself. I hope he knows that. Thank you all for loving him too.

    57K1.7K8651121.7M viewsView on X
  • Jul 11, 202613x their median

    We will be having the wedding at Maddison Square Garden everyone can come

    45K42829619885K viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 202613x their median

    #obviously I know that death affects people. but my grandma died when my mom was in her 50s(grandma in her 80s) and i was like ok that seems like enough time. but I was wrong and she has not been the same since my gma died and that was 10yrs ago.

    44K6581153481.4M viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 202610x their median

    Lebron James is signing with the Philadelphia 76ers. https://t.co/I2Y3SUH3x8

    34K1.7K5121.4K5.4M viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20268.5x their median

    My ferritin level is 8. Didn’t take my iron pills this past week cause my OCD decided they were silly. Having a monsoon of a period. If I don’t make it all I ask is that you keep Cdawg away from Ludwig. He deserves Squeex.

    30K21813828930K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20268.3x their median

    It’s never been 57 bears I’ll tell ya that much

    28K1.5K16422601K viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 20267.5x their median

    WHY IS EVERYONE FORGETTING I PLAYED VARSITY VOLLEYBALL UNTIL I GOT CUT FOR HAVING A BAD ATTITUDE. I’m gonna carry at volleyball AND having a bad attitude. Bitch almost got a full ride in both.

    27K164985688K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20266.6x their median

    https://t.co/QOYFLhdgS9

    21K2.1K1048274.8M viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 20265.8x their median

    Coming out of retirement for the dream team. I am so excited to be the only team with 5 beautiful strong independent women. https://t.co/cNjnb8vTPU

    20K1988023692K viewsView on X
  • Jul 26, 20265.3x their median

    Am I insane or is the dry humping fans on stage trend SO FUCKING WEIRD

    19K93215392.2M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3.6K interactions against 608K followers, an engagement rate of 0.588%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 93% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 216K times each, and 1.66% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 35.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.8 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 60K interactions, about 17x its own typical post.

What is QTCinderella's engagement rate on X?
QTCinderella (@qtcinderella) has an engagement rate of 0.588%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 607,750 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.588%, QTCinderella sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,805 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @qtcinderella have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 93% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @qtcinderella post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going