Piques π¨π¦ πΊπΈ engagement report
@piques15 - 107K followers on X
Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 3 interactions against 107K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 9% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.1K times each, and 0.141% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.00% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 11% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 614 interactions, about 205x its own typical post.
Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Piques π¨π¦ πΊπΈ's engagement rate beats 9% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 8% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.003%, Piques π¨π¦ πΊπΈ sits below the 10th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.147% |
| 75th percentile | 0.698% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.8% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 11% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 11% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 93 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 21, 2026205x their median
Ken Griffinβs Citadel has already shed more than 80% of the aggregate risk it took on from Leopold Aschenbrennerβs Situational Awareness portfolio. Griffin on the exit: βThese included the largest intraday block trades of the year in 10 different names. In the United States, we quickly exited the vast majority of the vega risk, saving substantial capital in the process. Of the remaining positions in G10, only five have a gross market value greater than $250 million...β
- Aug 24, 20263.0x their median
Sanchez is the worst GK in Chelsea history.
- Sep 22, 20261.7x their median
Sold all my Meta shares (again). Bought June 15th, sold Sep 22nd. 25% gain. Thesis: Muse actually sucks, OpenAI will create their own with far greater capabilities.
- Sep 20, 20261.7x their median
I talked to my ai agent for 13 hours today.
- Sep 7, 20261.7x their median
I truly think this has been the best year for video games... EVER.
- Sep 21, 2026
Nothing pains me more than selling a stock too early.
- Aug 14, 2026
This will be $GOOGL bottom. We just made a higher low. Get ready for $400. https://t.co/IHc6MBtiBM
- Oct 2, 2026
Google should buy Robinhood and impliment stock trading directly by using Google Finance in the browser. It is a no brainer. $GOOG $HOOD
- Sep 22, 2026
You either use AI and retain or increase your wealth. or You cry about it and stay poor.
- Aug 6, 2026
Mfers will tell you to short this company because 4 employees out of 187,108 left the company. $GOOG https://t.co/yUzVbQfjTN
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 3 interactions against 107K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 9% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.1K times each, and 0.141% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.00% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 11% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 614 interactions, about 205x its own typical post.
- What is Piques π¨π¦ πΊπΈ's engagement rate on X?
- Piques π¨π¦ πΊπΈ (@piques15) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 106,534 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.003%, Piques π¨π¦ πΊπΈ sits below the 10th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @piques15 have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 9% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @piques15 post?
- Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.07 posts per day across the measured window.