Back to @peterjkostis's profile

Peter Kostis engagement report

@peterjkostis - 5.1M followers on X

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.002%
of 5.1M followers
Per impression
0.502%
24K views on a typical post
Reach
0.47%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
120
interactions (median)
Saved
0.013%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
5.13/day
active 97% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 120 interactions against 5.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 18% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 24K times each, and 0.502% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.472% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 39% carry an image or video and 68% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 58K interactions, about 694x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #dcvax, #dcvaxforbraelyn, #gbm.

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026. Recurring tags: #dcvax, #dcvaxforbraelyn, #gbm.

Compared with accounts its own size

Peter Kostis's engagement rate beats 18% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 31% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.002%, Peter Kostis sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,482 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.696%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,482 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,403 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.696%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video39% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link68% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 39% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 68% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 472 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Apr 26, 2026694x their median

    🚨 Brit Hume drops hard truth: “The Democratic Party has drifted farther to the left than I’ve ever seen. They are out where the buses don’t run.” “Conservatives tend to be proud to be Americans, no matter who is in office. But liberals in this country have gone sour on America. They’ve given up on America. They’re rooting against America.” A party infected with radical, anti-American ideology. Democrats can’t even say America is great when their own team is in charge. #BritHume #Democrats #AmericaFirst

    44K12K995390862K viewsView on X
  • Jul 2, 2026252x their median

    I can't stop listening to this song. Best thing that came out of the World cup being in the United States this year. 🇺🇸 Watching this compilation of fans from all over the world at the 2026 World Cup in America is so heartwarming. USA USA USA 🇺🇸https://t.co/mwAWzAKcsg

    23K3.2K7304292.1M viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 202679x their median

    Seriously? @GolfChannel ? Why should a player "graciously" accept a penalty that they honestly feel that they didn't deserve? If someone shows me a DEFINITIVE camera angle that showed his swing path was improved then there should be a penalty. But for a commentator to state that he definitely did improve his situation is , in my opinion, more about their personal opinion of Bryson than the facts. There is no down the line video that I have seen.

    7.6K70092199409K viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 202658x their median

    In my opinion, with the depth of field issues with TV cameras and no definitive camera angles of his swing path, there cannot be conclusive video evidence that Bryson improved his lie or swing path. In cases like this the benefit of doubt should go to the player. I don't like this decision.

    5.9K47756266388K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202627x their median

    Imagine buying Moderna $MRNA after it's gone up 160%, not knowing that: 1. The first person in the world who took Moderna's mRNA-4157 Cancer vaccine outside of Clinical Trials died recently with no improvement - he was a jabbed Australian Cancer Researcher (@ProfRAScolyer) 2. Moderna's mRNA Cancer Vaccine is actually 18 to 27 injections (Phase 2 had 27 injections, Phase 3 had 18) 3. Moderna's mRNA Cancer Vaccine has an upto 36% severe side effect rate (Grade 3+) 4. Moderna didn't actually give us any results of their Phase 3 INTerpath-001 Trial and Phase 2 results were underwhelming at best 5. Merck actually takes 50% of the profit of every Moderna mRNA Cancer Vaccine sold 😂 This was a Big Pharma bot driven news day with no substance whatsoever. If you bought low, this was an excellent dead cat bounce as far as a stock move is concerned, but that's all this is. There is no "cure for cancer" here, sorry to say 🙄

    4.0K1.3K205151336K viewsView on X
  • Mar 21, 202611x their median

    The CBS studio for March Madness is embarrassing. Well done CBS Sports management.

    2.1K8212410122K viewsView on X
  • May 17, 202625x their median

    For obvious reasons, I choose to not comment on golf announcing but I'm making an exception. Doing just a couple of events a year is, in itself, quite difficult but @david59duval impressed me this week. In an age where many announcers are either scripted or tend to do radio and tell you what you just saw, David did a very good job of letting the pictures tell you "what" and he explained the "why". Well done sir.....

    1.9K601454137K viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 202610x their median

    ❤️ IT’S OFFICIAL! WE’RE MEETING PRESIDENT TRUMP TOMORROW! 🇺🇸 Braelyn and I have been invited to attend tomorrow’s rally for Darline Graham in Clemson! We’ll be seated in the VIP section AND have the opportunity to meet President Trump in the “click line”! Ben is cutting his work trip short, and we’re hoping he’ll make it home in time to join us! We’ll have only seconds with the President, but I intend to make every one of them count. I’ll also be bringing information for him and his staff about Braelyn, DCVax-L, and the barriers American patients face trying to access promising treatments developed right here in the United States. This is an extraordinary opportunity, but we’re hoping it can become something even bigger. PLEASE HELP US GET THE ATTENTION OF THE WHITE HOUSE PRESS TEAM! 🙏 We would love the opportunity for a longer conversation with President Trump or his administration about how we can make these treatments accessible to American patients. Please SHARE, REPOST, and TAG anyone who might help get Braelyn’s story in front of the right people! Three years ago, Braelyn was given just months to live. Today she’s 19, attending college, and her latest MRI shows NO EVIDENCE OF DISEASE RECURRENCE! Her story deserves to be heard. And so do the stories of countless other patients fighting for access to promising treatments. @realDonaldTrump @DrOzCMS @WhiteHouse #DCVaxForBraelyn #DCVax #PresidentTrump

    7732661396878K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20268.9x their median

    This is an observation and not intended to be seen as an excuse because I detest excuses. However, it is my opinion since the PGA Tour invented the Presidents Cup, having a "team event" every year has been problematic. US players are expected to play every year while their opponents get a year off and 2 years to build up excitement and emotion for the competition. Same goes for the fans. I get it. The PGA Tour has no ownership of The Ryder Cup while the European tour does. So the Tour creates the PC and owns the whole thing. Neither team this year put forth the best US players or the best international players. They put forth the best players who are members of the PGA Tour. Professional golf needs to get its act together and provide the fans with a good entertaining product. To me, that means best against the best and not every week or every year because that waters down the anticipation and excitement for everyone.

    8253020811177K viewsView on X
  • Jul 12, 20262.8x their median

    📣📣JUDGE IN NWBO MAKES KEY ALGORITHMIC DATA DISCOVERABLE This is a very important win for Northwest Biotherapeutic NWBO. Algorithmic data proves the intent to harm the company and shareholders. They want you to believe it is just a market happenstance caused by the wider market instead of a coordinated planned attack. We are finally seeing Judges allowing discovery. In the MMTLP bankruptcy case, the Judge has also ordered discovery. Firms like Citadel Securities and Virtu Financial are named in many cases, accused of market manipulation. Their high paid attorney's are not being successful at getting these cases dismissed and the crime to go undiscovered. MAYBE THE TIDES ARE TURNING 🙏🙏

    402159165120K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#dcvax#dcvaxforbraelyn#gbm#immunotherapy#𝗗𝗖𝗩𝗮𝘅

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 120 interactions against 5.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 18% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 24K times each, and 0.502% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.472% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 39% carry an image or video and 68% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 58K interactions, about 694x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #dcvax, #dcvaxforbraelyn, #gbm.

What is Peter Kostis's engagement rate on X?
Peter Kostis (@peterjkostis) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 28 original posts from the last 30 days against 5,088,725 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.002%, Peter Kostis sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,482 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @peterjkostis have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 18% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @peterjkostis post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going