Back to @pedroj_ramirez's profile

Pedro J. Ramírez engagement report

@pedroj_ramirez - 480K followers on X

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.057%
of 480K followers
Per impression
2.73%
10.0K views on a typical post
Reach
2.08%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
273
interactions (median)
Saved
0.02%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.67/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
07:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 273 interactions against 480K followers, an engagement rate of 0.057%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 61% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 10.0K times each, and 2.73% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.08% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 27% are part of a thread and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.3K interactions, about 23x its own typical post.

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Pedro J. Ramírez's engagement rate beats 61% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 75% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.057%, Pedro J. Ramírez sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,925 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9983.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,925 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,436 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 253 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 26, 202623x their median

    A partir de hoy no es que Sánchez gobierne 'sin el Parlamento'. Es mucho peor. A partir de hoy gobierna contra el Parlamento, algo inaudito en una democracia representativa. https://t.co/K0yh9T9y3O

    4.0K1.7K5817149K viewsView on X
  • Jun 25, 20264.4x their median

    Sánchez tenía ayer tres salidas acordes a la gravedad de su responsabilidad política. La primera era la dimisión. La segunda, la convocatoria inmediata de elecciones. La tercera, la cuestión de confianza. No eligió ninguna de las tres https://t.co/aPFgFFBOa2

    1.9K7216196156K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 202611x their median

    Mientras militares, bomberos, voluntarios y hasta 'brigadistas' internacionales luchan con denuedo contra el fuego, el sembrador de cizaña no pierde un sólo día en su labor cainita. Oscar Puente se postula como recambio de Sánchez https://t.co/m7kG8JdNkB

    1.0K3731.5K117264K viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 20267.7x their median

    Lo de la 'ley de nietos' no sólo tiene todos los visos de una manipulación del censo electoral. Ahora también adquiere la dimensión de tomadura de pelo colectiva. Porque como demostramos, el coladero de la nacionalización alcanza ya a dos generaciones más https://t.co/bSdkHX9qfN

    1.3K724981323K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20267.3x their median

    Casi habría sido preferible que Sánchez hubiera seguido de vacaciones. Su reaparición en la radio de siempre, con las comodidades de siempre, no ha podido ser más calamitosa https://t.co/VSrlfbkQ4J

    1.4K4101431516K viewsView on X
  • Jun 29, 20266.6x their median

    Que Sánchez pudiera prometer de nuevo ante el Comité Federal del PSOE "abolir la infame prostitución" sin que nadie le preguntara -ni vaya a hacerlo hoy en sus medios- por las saunas de su suegro, da buena medida de las tragaderas de la izquierda https://t.co/4BYjLnjrpv

    8723675124148K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 20266.4x their median

    Pronto sabremos el desenlace pero ni convocando, ni continuando tienen los males de Sánchez remedio. Por eso la pregunta de estas horas cruciales es qué última trampa estará preparando este hombre para manipular el veredicto de las urnas https://t.co/hb4fBsUQ2q

    8133245554336K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20265.6x their median

    Nuestro sondeo sobre Castilla-La Mancha sitúa a Page ante la decisión más difícil de su vida política. La gran mayoría en la región quiere que sus ocho diputados nacionales tumben el modelo de financiación pactado por Sánchez con Esquerra https://t.co/SDc7h9rmyo

    1.0K3701071115K viewsView on X
  • Jul 1, 20265.1x their median

    Como el Gobierno admite que cuando dijo que habría medio millón de regularizaciones "ya barajaba" que fueran más del doble, destapa una mentira y un fraude: no alarmar a la población con un número inasumible de nuevos residentes y el efecto llamada https://t.co/gb30fkMGnL

    7574381731317K viewsView on X
  • Jul 2, 20265.0x their median

    Cuanto más se profundiza en el debate más sentido tiene tratar de parar la "fábrica de españoles" creada a través de la "ley de nietos". Y hace muy bien Feijóo en liderar esa ofensiva política https://t.co/aqRBf2IvOM

    6372764093533K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 273 interactions against 480K followers, an engagement rate of 0.057%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 61% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 10.0K times each, and 2.73% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.08% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 27% are part of a thread and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.3K interactions, about 23x its own typical post.

What is Pedro J. Ramírez's engagement rate on X?
Pedro J. Ramírez (@pedroj_ramirez) has an engagement rate of 0.057%, based on the median interactions across 15 original posts from the last 30 days against 480,171 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.057%, Pedro J. Ramírez sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,925 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @pedroj_ramirez have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 61% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @pedroj_ramirez post?
Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going