Back to @paurooteri's profile

パウロ engagement report

@paurooteri - 93K followers on X

Measured over 82 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 21, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.124%
of 93K followers
Per impression
0.441%
26K views on a typical post
Reach
28.0%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
114
interactions (median)
Saved
0.033%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
5.63/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 114 interactions against 93K followers, an engagement rate of 0.124%. Measured over 82 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 26K times each, and 0.441% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 27.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 82 posts sampled, 21% carry an image or video, 10% are part of a thread and 23% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 36K interactions, about 319x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #blackwell, #earnings, #verarubin.

Measured over 82 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 21, 2026. Recurring tags: #blackwell, #earnings, #verarubin.

Compared with accounts its own size

パウロ's engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 21% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.124%, パウロ sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,741 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.697%
p902.61%
p9982.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,741 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,375 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.697%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video21% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link23% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 21% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 23% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 299 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 20, 2026319x their median

    私のスマホを取り上げ厨房に入り 「取れるものなら取ってみろ」 と厨房の中で追いかけっこ すき家と話し合いもしたけど、あまりにもバカにしてるので公開すると言ったら 「仕方ありません。酷すぎます」 との許可済み ちなみに部外者が中に入ったのにその後も営業していました #すき家 #営業法違反 https://t.co/TQtVfAgKRH

    28K1.8K3.1K3.3K25M viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202687x their median

    ⚡Meet Qwen3.8-Flash, a multimodal MoE and an early preview of the Qwen4 architecture, now open-weight! The production version Qwen3.8-Flash will be available soon via QwenCloud API at just $ 0.16/1M input tokens and $ 0.47/1M output tokens. 125B parameters + 51B N-gram embeddings, with just 6B activated per token. Unmatched cost-efficiency. What's new: 🥳 - Next architecture: GDN + QSA hybrid attention, Gated Residual, N-gram Embedding & Muon optimizer, serving as a precursor to the architecture used in Qwen4. - Dramatically lower training and inference costs: trained at just 1/9 the cost of Qwen3.7-Plus, while outperforming it across the board with especially strong gains in coding and office tasks. - Strong performance: scoring 58.7 on DeepSWE 1.1, 62.5 on SWE-bench Pro, 73.9 on CoWorkBench, 84.5 on AndroidWorld, and 95.7 on MathVision (with CI). - 262K native context, extensible to 1M with YaRN. We’re also releasing the weights for Qwen3.8-Flash-Next, giving the community an early look at the new architecture we’re exploring for Qwen4.🚀 We can't wait to see what you build with Qwen3.8-Flash!👀👇 - Blog: https://t.co/M5hYypFLgJ - Technical Report: https://t.co/IF0gObIkQO - Hugging Face: https://t.co/6ow8QVAABt - ModelScope: https://t.co/tDOn2jNuFG

    7.9K1.0K4535641.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202630x their median

    JUST IN: Nvidia $NVDA in talks to acquire Hugging Face for $13,000,000,000. This is the AI platform that an OpenAI agent previously hacked.

    3.1K21614149461K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202629x their median

    $NVDA (Nvidia) #earnings are out: https://t.co/zOLAMFz8UX

    2.9K248681311.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202627x their median

    これ、東大の友人とはいつも話しているが、東大出たからにはそれまでの苦労が報われるようなポジションに就けないと意味がないと言う結論に達する。 具体的には、在宅勤務が出来たり、フレックスが出来たり、安定していてこれ以上競争させられなかったり、解雇規制でガチガチに守られていたり、生活に困らない程度の残業時間だったり。 そう言う、「これ以上苦労しなくても良い」ポジションに身を置けないなら受験勉強を頑張った意味がないよねと言う結論にいつも2人で話していると辿り着く。 ただ現実問題として、なかなかそのような安泰なポジションは用意されておらず、常に競争させられるんだけど。 医学部のように「今後は競争しなくてよい、今後失敗することがない椅子」を確保出来ている人が素直に羨ましい。

    2.3K32314493.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202614x their median

    メタプラに関して至極真っ当なことを言っている 与沢って思っていたより結構まともだな😅 https://t.co/Ldz52iLRCL

    1.5K115067611K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202611x their median

    Announcing the expansion of NVIDIA NVLink Fusion with NVHBM, a next-generation high-bandwidth memory technology that brings higher memory performance and efficiency to XPUs. Amazon's @AnnapurnaLabs will be the first to work with us on NVHBM, combining @awscloud custom silicon with our memory technology and the NVLink scale-up architecture to enhance performance and efficiency for AI workloads. Learn how we're helping hyperscalers and AI innovators build the next generation of AI infrastructure: https://t.co/5Z2gmTrtTL

    1.1K1243443364K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20269.1x their median

    $NVDA CFO on memory, supply and margins: “We are experiencing extreme pricing conditions in memory. The magnitude of the price increase has exceeded our prior expectations and is headed even higher into next year.” Nvidia expects supply to remain a bottleneck through at least the end of FY28. Gross margins: Q3: 74% ±50 bps Q4: bottom at 71%-72% FY28: settle around 72%-73% (Est. 74%) “As executed price increases take effect in Q1.” “Memory scarcity today is being driven in large part by the AI buildout itself... tighter memory supply is a symptom of the same demand surge that’s driving our own growth.”

    8221492245218K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20267.6x their median

    AIバブルはこうして終わる 金利高と収穫逓減「死の交差」 https://t.co/AgZJfBWba6 投資額ほど収益が伸びないAI産業。資本が稼ぐ力は大規模クラウド5社で低下しています。ピーク時は資本100ドルあたり95ドルの追加利益でしたが、いまは13ドルです。

    5292135373251K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20267.1x their median

    I sat down with @dylan522p and spoke with over a dozen people about his information machine. "I don't think anyone who has a traditional equity research background would even try to figure out where $3T in [the AI labs' combined] ARR comes from." Slack private messaging limits, finding CoWoS volume, and the industry they're looking at next - I wrote about SemiAnalysis here: https://t.co/0FVDIJNaGe

    704504317291K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#blackwell#earnings#verarubin#すき家#営業法違反

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 114 interactions against 93K followers, an engagement rate of 0.124%. Measured over 82 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 26K times each, and 0.441% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 27.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 82 posts sampled, 21% carry an image or video, 10% are part of a thread and 23% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 36K interactions, about 319x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #blackwell, #earnings, #verarubin.

What is パウロ's engagement rate on X?
パウロ (@paurooteri) has an engagement rate of 0.124%, based on the median interactions across 82 original posts from the last 30 days against 92,839 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.124%, パウロ sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,741 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @paurooteri have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @paurooteri post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going