Back to @patrickbetdavid's profile

Patrick Bet-David engagement report

@patrickbetdavid - 1.5M followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.167%
of 1.5M followers
Per impression
2.37%
103K views on a typical post
Reach
7.03%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.5K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.164%
169 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.63/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 2.5K interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.167%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 103K times each, and 2.37% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.03% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 31% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 48K interactions, about 20x its own typical post.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Patrick Bet-David's engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 71% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.167%, Patrick Bet-David sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,349 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.146% to 0.696%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.696%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,349 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,452 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.696%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video31% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 31% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 168 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 14, 202620x their median

    Used car salesman sells mixed race couple a 2009 Dodge Charger at 32% APR https://t.co/hx1KpsMb66

    45K2.4K5082222.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202617x their median

    The man has the energy of a 24 yr old. The wit of Johnny Carson. The charisma of Elvis Presley. The sense of humor of Don Rickles. The trolling ability of Muhammad Ali. All rolled into one. Love him or hate him, Donald Trump is one of a kind.

    32K4.1K6.1K5521.5M viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 202616x their median

    CEO vs President who's most likely I'm still not happy about the last question. https://t.co/MUU8Se9Bri

    38K1.1K376623.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 202614x their median

    Rough day for CNN & Dana Bash. They did everything in their power to demonize @RobertKennedyJr and he came on top. Respect for his perseverance! https://t.co/AnBfqd6s6F

    29K3.2K1.9K136445K viewsView on X
  • Oct 26, 202614x their median

    Brazil is a tragic case study. Once you let communism in, it’s tough to vote it out. They sink their claws into the Supreme Court and do everything possible legal or illegal to stay in power, even after Flávio destroyed Lula (a criminal) in the debate. Stay alert 🇺🇸!

    28K4.1K2.2K213734K viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 202613x their median

    Poland stats: Lowest unemployment rate in the EU. Lowest homicide in EU. Lowest rape in EU. Highest home ownership in EU. (85-90%) Lowest debt to GDP ratio. Population 38 million. Their #1 priority is the people of 🇵🇱. Be like Poland. https://t.co/KFcng2y0nz

    26K5.1K755164590K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 202612x their median

    The people won today. Whatever side you’re on, respect to Candace Owens and Andrew Wilson for stepping into the arena and having the debate. It’s not easy. Agree or disagree with either of them, give credit to both for showing up and putting their ideas on the line. https://t.co/sQK3q66Coi

    24K8405.1K3671.5M viewsView on X
  • Oct 21, 202610x their median

    JUST IN: Google co-founder Larry Page has reportedly moved into a $173M home in Miami to avoid $15B of California taxes https://t.co/BEaoRklR7d

    23K1.3K8265374.7M viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20267.9x their median

    The most effective way to create wealth is boring. It's "buy and hold". I bought a Kobe card for $6,000 in 2007 and sold it for $17,000 in 2009. I thought I won. Today that card is worth over $2,000,000. Be patient.

    18K94153975712K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20267.7x their median

    🚨Aryna Sabalenka on newly introduced sex testing by the WTA: “I support it. If they want to test us all, I'm happy to do that." Boom. 💥 Thank you @SabalenkaA https://t.co/WqLN9NpYfX

    17K1.6K193841.6M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.5K interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.167%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 103K times each, and 2.37% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.03% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 31% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 48K interactions, about 20x its own typical post.

What is Patrick Bet-David's engagement rate on X?
Patrick Bet-David (@patrickbetdavid) has an engagement rate of 0.167%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,468,482 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.167%, Patrick Bet-David sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,349 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @patrickbetdavid have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @patrickbetdavid post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going