Back to @olhardigital's profile

Olhar Digital engagement report

@olhardigital - 1.5M followers on X

Measured over 655 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 1.5M followers
Per impression
0.406%
2.2K views on a typical post
Reach
0.15%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
9
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
22.5/day
active 103% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 9 interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 655 original posts, its engagement rate beats 8% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.2K times each, and 0.406% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.147% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 22.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 655 posts sampled, 28% carry an image or video and 71% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 171 interactions, about 19x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #olhardigital, #ia, #brasil.

Measured over 655 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026. Recurring tags: #olhardigital, #ia, #brasil.

Compared with accounts its own size

Olhar Digital's engagement rate beats 8% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 26% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, Olhar Digital sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,078 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.694%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,078 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,460 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.694%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video28% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link71% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 28% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 71% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 197 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 23, 202619x their median

    A Meta derrubou temporariamente do Instagram o perfil oficial da série de reportagens “Revelando”, que publicou um episódio apresentado por Fábio Porchat sobre relações envolvendo o Banco Master, a Igreja Batista da Lagoinha e personagens da política. #fábio #porchat #revelando #bancomaster https://t.co/WWBBHe1r4T

    14522408.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202613x their median

    AO VIVO | ASSISTA AO ECLIPSE LUNAR NO BRASIL | 27/08/2026 https://t.co/zEnqGrRoIa

    98107110K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 202612x their median

    🤖 Robô se defende após ser empurrado por homem na Rússia Imagens de câmeras de segurança de uma loja de eletrônicos viralizaram ao mostrar um robô humanoide aparentemente reagindo após ser empurrado por um homem. 📲 Você confia nos humanoides? 😂 #robo #humanoide https://t.co/xiZKLMX94t

    76129716K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 202610x their median

    A Meta afirmou que proibiu temporariamente a geração de imagens de candidatos por meio de suas ferramentas de inteligência artificial (IA) em cumprimento às regras eleitorais brasileiras. O posicionamento foi enviado ao Olhar Digital após testes mostrarem que o Meta AI, disponível no WhatsApp, recusava pedidos relacionados a Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (PT), mas aceitava gerar artes com o nome de Flávio Bolsonaro (PL). #OlharDigital #Eleições2026 https://t.co/ou54EndoWv

    70146310K viewsView on X
  • Oct 17, 20269.9x their median

    A Meta pode pagar R$500 mil por dia se não garantir tratamento igualitário a Lula e Flávio Bolsonaro em suas plataformas. A determinação veio do Tribunal Superior Eleitoral (TSE) após denúncias envolvendo a inteligência artificial (IA) da empresa. Usuários relataram que a Meta AI bloqueava pedidos de imagens de Lula, mas permitia gerar conteúdos relacionados a Flávio Bolsonaro. A campanha petista acionou a Justiça, e o caso passou a ser investigado. A empresa negou intenção política e alegou cumprir a legislação eleitoral. Saiba mais na matéria completa! https://t.co/j4p4Sp6itc

    64111316.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20269.0x their median

    Defesa antiaérea doméstica: laser caça mosquitos no ar #laser #mosquito #tecnologia https://t.co/kbzAoWGDBK

    7153216K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20268.3x their median

    IMAGENS FORTES Uma região entre o Nepal e o Tibete foi atingida por uma inundação repentina. Informações iniciais dão conta de nove mortes. Segundo o Conselho de Turismo do Nepal, 384 viajantes que estão no país, sendo 291 estrangeiros, estão desaparecidos. Crédito: CCTV #Nepal #Tibete #inundação #desastre

    6491112K viewsView on X
  • Oct 26, 20267.1x their median

    Com a vitória nas urnas garantida, o governo reeleito precisará aprofundar os trabalhos em áreas como inteligência artificial, proteção de dados, terras raras e transição energética. O desafio agora é acelerar a reindustrialização verde, buscando avanços tecnológicos e a proteção ambiental com forte presença do Estado. #OlharDigital #Eleições2026 https://t.co/E6Cid13slf

    3642408.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20267.0x their median

    A compra e venda de carros usados poderá ganhar um novo processo digital no Brasil. Uma resolução publicada pelo Conselho Nacional de Trânsito (Contran) na terça-feira (18) estabeleceu regras para permitir que a transferência de propriedade seja realizada eletronicamente, reunindo procedimentos que atualmente podem ocorrer em sistemas e etapas diferentes. #CNH #carro #Brasil #documento https://t.co/avOFlXcUGL

    5561112K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20266.9x their median

    Registro raro de sprites obtido pelo Observatório Bate-Papo Astronômico, em Santa Maria (RS), na madrugada de 10 de setembro de 2026, que capturou também um meteoro na sequência. https://t.co/kjJKWI6BjY

    5930012K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#olhardigital#ia#brasil#eleições2026#games

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 9 interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 655 original posts, its engagement rate beats 8% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.2K times each, and 0.406% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.147% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 22.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 655 posts sampled, 28% carry an image or video and 71% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 171 interactions, about 19x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #olhardigital, #ia, #brasil.

What is Olhar Digital's engagement rate on X?
Olhar Digital (@olhardigital) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 655 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,511,832 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, Olhar Digital sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,078 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @olhardigital have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 8% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @olhardigital post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 22.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going