Back to @ofc_the_club's profile

OneFootball Club engagement report

@ofc_the_club - 458K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.079%
of 458K followers
Per impression
0.943%
38K views on a typical post
Reach
8.39%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
363
interactions (median)
Saved
0.033%
12 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.47/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 363 interactions against 458K followers, an engagement rate of 0.079%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 38K times each, and 0.943% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.40% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 866 interactions, about 2.4x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

OneFootball Club's engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 45% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.079%, OneFootball Club sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,741 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.697%
p902.61%
p9982.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,741 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,375 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.697%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video75% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link50% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 75% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 50% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 234 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 28, 20262.4x their median

    July $OFC re-claim is now live 🟢 We resolved an issue and upgraded our claim tracking mechanism with 4 additional layers of protection. There's now a master lock, a lock on availability and expiration, a lock based on onchain events and a lock in between current and outstanding claims. Exploiters have been identified and disallowed from all future claims and rewards.

    4114238429118K viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 20262.2x their median

    One last battle before World Cup Final. Who's taking home the bronze? 🥉 👀 ▫️Follow @ofc_the_club ▫️Drop your exact score prediction in the comments One lucky winner might receive a small gift 🤝

    31592381239K viewsView on X
  • Jun 25, 20261.8x their median

    Who's gonna win tonight? Comment the exact score below, we might send a small gift to someone 🤝

    33246392945K viewsView on X
  • Jul 2, 20262.1x their median

    MATCHDAY CHALLENGE 🚨 Portugal vs Croatia today 🇵🇹🇭🇷 Predict: 1️⃣ Exact final score 2️⃣ How many goals Ronaldo scores Drop your answer before kickoff! One lucky winner might receive a small gift 🤝

    30977377638K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20262.0x their median

    We're aware of unusual activity surrounding the July $OFC airdrop claim. Some wallets were unable to claim, while others were able to claim multiple times. The issue has been identified and the claim remains paused while we complete review and remediation. Separately, we are also reviewing wallets that claimed multiple times and will determine appropriate next steps. We take this seriously. User funds are safe. Updates to follow.

    4203823615135K viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 20261.9x their median

    Who’s taking the win tonight? Comment the exact score below, we might send a small gift to someone 🤝

    29347355843K viewsView on X
  • Jun 12, 20261.6x their median

    Let's kick off the World Cup with a brand-new mini game: Guess the Player 🎉 👉 https://t.co/DXSoytW38V ▫️ Every 24h, a new player drops at 4pm UTC ▫️ Guess: Which player does it look like? ▫️ Mint your favourite OneFootball Head player Don't miss a day, every single player counts 🤫

    485751171754K viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 20261.9x their median

    MATCHDAY CHALLENGE 🚨 1️⃣ Predict exact final score 2️⃣ How many goals Messi scores Drop your answer before kickoff! We might send a small gift to someone 🤝

    29560326639K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20261.9x their median

    We’ve launched our first partner quest with @Polymarket 🤝 You've smashed it! It’s currently paused due to overwhelming demand - more than 9.9M $OFC have already been earned by FanPass users! Already completed and still waiting? 4,000+ of you have received your $OFC already. Expect the remaining rewards to land next week. See all live quests: 👉 https://t.co/9G5K4rbALB

    437451861669K viewsView on X
  • Jun 11, 20262.0x their median

    1F Predict World Cup Update 🌎🏆 ▫️ May prize pool distributed ▫️ Predict now on World Cup matches ▫️ 250,000 $OFC prize pool for June 👉 https://t.co/Kvam021gFA https://t.co/idbMrN7bLF

    47189841232K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 363 interactions against 458K followers, an engagement rate of 0.079%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 38K times each, and 0.943% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.40% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 866 interactions, about 2.4x its own typical post.

What is OneFootball Club's engagement rate on X?
OneFootball Club (@ofc_the_club) has an engagement rate of 0.079%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 458,078 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.079%, OneFootball Club sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,741 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ofc_the_club have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ofc_the_club post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going