Back to @nongmoreport's profile

Organic & Non-GMO Report engagement report

@nongmoreport - 171K followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.002%
of 171K followers
Per impression
0.592%
592 views on a typical post
Reach
0.35%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
4
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.4/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 4 interactions against 171K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 9% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 592 times each, and 0.592% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.345% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 20% are part of a thread and 90% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 248 interactions, about 62x its own typical post.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Organic & Non-GMO Report's engagement rate beats 9% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 29% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.002%, Organic & Non-GMO Report sits below the 10th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,004 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,390 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link90% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 90% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 266 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Dec 29, 202162x their median

    Seeding the Future: Center for Regenerative Agriculture Receives $1 Million Gift https://t.co/uIPWrJpvD2 via @ChicoState

    15752381View on X
  • Jul 23, 20264.8x their median

    The Organic Trade Association forecasts that organic sales will grow by nearly $24 billion over the next five years, surpassing $100 billion by 2030. https://t.co/vzm7jjy2DC July Report, page 8 https://t.co/wwEjq1yCsu

    134111.1K viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 20264.0x their median

    Efforts to reduce pesticide use and expand organic land management practices are finding support from an increasingly diverse political coalition in the United States. https://t.co/HnIQFugSRU July Report, page 16 https://t.co/8Fm8xGg1bU

    13201739 viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 20263.3x their median

    Kathleen did tremendous work to advance organic agriculture in a state dominated by GMO corn and soybeans and hog factory farms. https://t.co/yzxfRh5y7a July Report, page 17 @KenRoseboro https://t.co/6XTcqe6XHH

    12100749 viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20263.0x their median

    Strengthening regional and local food systems could help countries reduce exposure to food price volatility caused by geopolitical disruptions, trade conflicts, and supply chain shocks. https://t.co/OH03Ln1ahs https://t.co/AOj8opsdRN

    9300624 viewsView on X
  • Oct 16, 20262.5x their median

    The Non-GMO Project's new Version 17 Standard adds sugarcane to its Non-Testable High Risk List, with the change taking effect December 1, 2028. Read the full article: https://t.co/RqjBPzVWMk https://t.co/bq6M9IJDFD

    7102550 viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 20262.3x their median

    Leaders from leading regenerative certification bodies reported continued acreage growth while acknowledging persistent barriers to farmer adoption during a standards focused panel at the 2026 Sustainable Foods Summit. https://t.co/wTErWDVSNA https://t.co/TryW7Ej3Ec

    5220979 viewsView on X
  • May 28, 20262.3x their median

    A new report from Friends of the Earth is raising concerns about the potential introduction of genetically engineered wheat into the U.S. food system, citing health, environmental, and economic risks. https://t.co/8fHDqJ6mLZ May Report page 18

    5220480 viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 20262.0x their median

    What priority would most strengthen domestic organic supply over the next decade? For this month’s Voice of the Industry, Kathleen Merrigan shares her thoughts on this question. Subscribe to read the October newsletter. Sent at 10:15 A.M CTA. https://t.co/N38WE5bON9 https://t.co/vTEsEu3qxG

    5210802 viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 20261.8x their median

    Honorable Mentions: Citrus and Potatoes https://t.co/aPoByY8dWK July Report, page 30 https://t.co/8Pc3712r0d

    6100851 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 4 interactions against 171K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 9% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 592 times each, and 0.592% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.345% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 20% are part of a thread and 90% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 248 interactions, about 62x its own typical post.

What is Organic & Non-GMO Report's engagement rate on X?
Organic & Non-GMO Report (@nongmoreport) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 171,375 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.002%, Organic & Non-GMO Report sits below the 10th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @nongmoreport have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 9% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @nongmoreport post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going