Back to @minealim3's profile

minea_lim engagement report

@minealim3 - 118K followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.006%
of 118K followers
Per impression
0.454%
1.6K views on a typical post
Reach
1.40%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
8
interactions (median)
Saved
0.061%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.33/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
03:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 118K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 15% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.6K times each, and 0.454% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.40% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 68 interactions, about 8.5x its own typical post.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026. Recurring tag: #αž€αŸ’αžšαž»αž„αžαžΆαžαŸ’αž˜αŸ….

Compared with accounts its own size

minea_lim's engagement rate beats 15% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 23% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.006%, minea_lim sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,656 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.697%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,656 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,418 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.697%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 119 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 11, 20258.5x their median

    αž˜αž“αž»αžŸαŸ’αžŸαž‚αŸ’αžšαž”αŸ‹αž‚αŸ’αž“αžΆαž‘αŸ€αž„αžαŸ‚αž“αžΉαž„αžŸαŸ’αž›αžΆαž”αŸ‹-αž‘αŸ„αŸ‡αž”αžΈαž…αž·αžαŸ’αžαžαŸ‚αž„αžαŸ‚αž˜αž·αž“αž‘αŸ€αž„αž€αŸαžŠαŸ„αž™-αžαŸ’αž›αž½αž“αž―αž„αž‡αžΆαž‘αžΈαž–αžΉαž„αž“αŸƒαžαŸ’αž›αž½αž“αž―αž„-αž’αŸ’αž“αž€αžŠαž‘αŸƒαž…αžΌαž›αž˜αž€αž€αŸ’αž“αž»αž„αžšαž™αŸˆαž–αŸαž›αž€αŸ†αžŽαžαŸ‹αž”αŸ‰αž»αžŽαŸ’αžŽαŸ„αŸ‡ @minealim3 #αž€αŸ’αžšαž»αž„αžαžΆαžαŸ’αž˜αŸ… https://t.co/M3Ivkafh9r

    6413020K viewsView on X
  • Jun 15, 20263.3x their median

    αž’αžαžΈαžαž αž½αžŸαž αžΎαž™ - αž”αž…αŸ’αž…αž»αž”αŸ’αž”αž“αŸ’αž“β€‹αž€αŸαž€αŸ†αž–αž»αž„αž”αž˜αŸ’αžšαž»αž„αž“αž·αž„αž αž½αžŸαžŠαŸ‚αžšβ€‹ -​ αž˜αžΆαž“αžαŸ‚αž’αž“αžΆαž‚αžαŸ‹αž‘αŸαžŠαŸ‚αž›αž˜αž·αž“αž‘αžΆαž“αŸ‹αž˜αž€αžŠαž›αŸ‹ - αž αžΎαž™β€‹αž…αž»αŸ‡β€‹ U αž–αŸαž›αžŽαžΆβ€‹ αž…αžΌαž›αž˜αž€αž…αŸ’αž”αžΆαžŸαŸ‹αž›αžΆαžŸαŸ‹αž€αŸ’αž“αž»αž„αž‡αžΈαžœαž·αžαžαŸ’αž‰αž»αŸ†! @minealim3 #αž€αŸ’αžšαž»αž„αžαžΆαžαŸ’αž˜αŸ… https://t.co/d9mLsNyEg0

    240202.1K viewsView on X
  • May 16, 20262.9x their median

    αž–αŸαž›αžŸαŸ’αžšαžΆαžαžαž αžƒαžΎαž‰αžŸαž„αŸ’αž αžΆ αž‚αž½αžšαž²αŸ’αž™αž…αž„αŸ‹αžŸαŸŠαžΈαž…αž»αž€αžŠαŸ‚αžš αžαŸ‚αž–αŸαž›αžαžΊαž“αž»αž™ αžŸαžΌαž˜αŸ’αž”αžΈαžαŸ‚β€‹αžαŸ’αž›αž½αž“αž―αž„β€‹ αž€αŸαž‚αŸ’αž˜αžΆαž“αž’αžΆαžšαž˜αŸ’αž˜αžŽαŸαž…αž„αŸ‹αžŸαŸŠαžΈαž…αž»αž€αž’αžΈαžαž·αž…αŸ” αž‘αžΆαž€αŸ‹αž‘αž„αž²αŸ’αž™αž αžΎαž™αž˜αž€αž‘αžΆαž“αŸ‹β€‹ Single​ αŸ• @minealim3 #αž€αŸ’αžšαž»αž„αžαžΆαžαŸ’αž˜αŸ… https://t.co/Kku8z8Kghm

    191301.7K viewsView on X
  • May 14, 20262.9x their median

    αžαŸ’αžšαžΌαžœαž€αžΆαžšβ€‹αž”αŸ‚αž”αžŽαžΆ αž‚αž½αžšαž“αž·αž™αžΆαž™αž”αŸ‚αž”αž“αŸ„αŸ‡ - αžŸαž·αž…β€‹αž‚αž·αžαž›αž»αž™β€‹ - αžŸαž·αž…β€‹ αžαŸ‚αž‡αžΆαž˜αž½αž™αž€αŸ’αž˜αŸαž„αŸ— -​ αžŸαž·αž…β€‹αž”αžΆαž“β€‹αž‘αžΆαž›αŸ‹αžαŸ‚αžαŸ’αžšαžΌαžœαž…αž·αžαŸ’αž -​ αž“αž·αž™αžΆαž™β€‹αžαŸ’αžšαž„αŸ‹αŸ—β€‹ αžŸαŸ’αžšαž½αž›αž‡αžΆαž„αž”αžαŸ‹αž”αŸ‚αž“αžœαŸ‚αž„αž†αŸ’αž„αžΆαž™ αžœαžΆαžαžΆαžαž–αŸαž› U know! @minealim3 https://t.co/BHqozRpT8k

    220101.7K viewsView on X
  • May 17, 20262.6x their median

    αžαŸ’αž‰αž»αŸ†β€‹ Single αž…αž„αŸ‹β€‹αž˜αžΆαž“αžŠαŸƒαž‚αžΌ αžαŸ‚αž˜αž·αž“αž”αžΆαž“αž”αŸ’αžšαž€αžΆαžŸαžαžΆ αž²αŸ’αž™αžαŸ‚αž˜αž€αžŠαžΉαž„αžαŸ‚αž‘αž‘αž½αž› αž―αžŽαžΆαŸ” αžŸαžΌαž˜αž™αŸ„αž‚αž™αž›αŸ‹αž‡αž½αž™αž’αžΆαž“ bio αžαŸ’αž‰αž»αŸ†αž•αž„β€‹ αž˜αž»αž“αž’αŸ’αžœαžΎαž…αžšαž·αžαžŸαŸ’αžšαžΈαžŸαŸ’αž’αžΆαžβ€‹ αžαžΉαž„αž–αŸαž›αž‚αŸαž˜αž·αž“αž–αŸ’αžšαž˜αž‡αžΆαž˜αž½αž™!​​ #αž€αŸ’αžšαž»αž„αžαžΆαžαŸ’αž˜αŸ… https://t.co/PE4AWBQM4G

    190201.9K viewsView on X
  • May 17, 20262.4x their median

    αž‡αžΈαžœαž·αžαžšαžΆαž›αŸ‹αžαŸ’αž„αŸƒαž“αŸαŸ‡ αž αžαŸ‹β€‹ αž“αžΏαž™β€‹ αžαŸ’αž›αžΆαŸ†αž„αžŽαžΆαžŸαŸ‹β€‹αž αžΎαž™β€‹ αž αŸαžαž»αž’αžΈβ€‹αžαŸ’αžšαžΌαžœαž˜αž€αž“αžΏαž™αž€αŸ’αž“αž»αž„αž€αžΆαžšαž–αž“αŸ’αž™αž›αŸ‹αžšαžΏαž„ Type​ αž˜αž·αž“β€‹ Type αž“αž·αž„αž‘αŸ€αžαž’αž‰αŸ’αž…αžΉαž„! αž‡αž½αž™αž‚αŸ„αžšαž–αž€αžΆαžšαžŸαž˜αŸ’αžšαŸαž…αž…αž·αžαŸ’αžαžαŸ’αž‰αž»αŸ†αž•αž„αž”αžΆαž“αž’αžαŸ‹? @minealim3 https://t.co/lb9jl5UUtj

    190001.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20262.3x their median

    αž“αž·αž™αžΆαž™αž‚αŸ’αž“αžΆ αžαžΆβ€‹ αž˜αžΎαž›αž˜αž»αžβ€‹αž αžΎαž™β€‹ αž…αžΆαŸ†αž”αž“αŸ’αžαž…αžšαž…αžΆαžšαžΏαž„αž…αž»αž™αŸ” αžŠαž›αŸ‹αž˜αžΎαž›αžšαžΌαž”αž‚αŸαž αžΎαž™ αž’αžαŸ‹αž•αŸ’αž‰αžΎαžšαžΌαž”αž˜αž€αžœαž·αž‰ αž‚αž·αžαžαŸ‚αžŸαž½αžšαž”αž„αŸ’αžœαŸ‚αž‘αŸ…αžŽαžΈαž†αŸ’αž€αž»αž™πŸ’£β€‹αž€αžΎαžαž’αžΈαž”αžΆαž“αž‡αžΆαž…αžšαž·αžαž’αž“αŸ‹αž’αž‰αŸ’αž…αžΉαž„? @minealim3 #αž€αŸ’αžšαž»αž„αžαžΆαžαŸ’αž˜αŸ… https://t.co/TBaYQq3lbg

    160203.1K viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 20262.1x their median

    αž…αž»αž™αž‚αŸ’αž“αžΆαž’αžΆαžŸαŸ’αžšαŸαž™αž›αžΎαž€αžΆαžšαžŸαŸ’αž˜αŸαž‚αŸ’αžšαž…αž·αžαŸ’αž - αž…αž»αž™αž‚αŸ’αž“αžΆαž‘αžΆαž›αŸ‹αžαŸ‚αž…αŸαŸ‡αž‡αž½αž™αž‚αŸ’αž“αžΆαž±αŸ’αž™αžŸαŸ’αžšαž½αž› - αž”αž”αž½αž›αž‚αŸαž…αž»αž™ αž…αž„αŸ‹αžŸαŸ’αžšαž½αž›αžαŸ‚αž―αž„αž…αžΉαž„ αžŸαžΆαž”αŸ‹αžαŸ’αž›αž½αž“αž―αž„αž€αŸαž”αžΆαž“αžŠαŸ‚αžš @minealim3 #αž€αŸ’αžšαž»αž„αžαžΆαžαŸ’αž˜αŸ… https://t.co/EDFR6C2Tjq

    140301.7K viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 20262.0x their median

    αž˜αŸ’αž“αžΆαž€αŸ‹αž―αž„αž‘αŸ αžαŸ‚αž…αž„αŸ‹αž–αžΆαž€αŸ‹ αžŠαžΎαž˜αŸ’αž”αžΈαž€αžΆαžšαž–αžΆαžšαž”αŸ’αžšαž‘αžΆαž€αŸ‹αž–αŸαž›αžšαž½αž…αžšαžΆαž›αŸ‹πŸ˜ @minealim3 #αž€αŸ’αžšαž»αž„αžαžΆαžαŸ’αž˜αŸ… https://t.co/sousTnldeH

    121301.9K viewsView on X
  • Jun 20, 20262.0x their median

    αž’αž˜αŸ’αž˜αžαžΆαž‚αŸαž€αŸ’αž˜αŸαž„ αž™αžΎαž„αž’αžΆαž™αž»αž…αŸ’αžšαžΎαž“αž–αž·αž”αžΆαž€αžŽαžΆαžαŸ‹αž‚αŸαžŽαžΆαžŸαŸ‹ -​ αž…αžΉαž„αž˜αžΆαž“αžαŸ‚αž‘αŸ…αžšαž€αž‚αŸ’αž“αžΆαž“αŸ… spa αž‘αŸβ€‹αž„αžΆαž™αžŸαŸ’αžšαž½αž›αž‡αžΆαž„ αž…αž»αž™β€‹ + αž€αžΆαžšαž–αžΆαžšβ€‹ αžŠαŸ„αž™αž”αŸ’αžšαžΎαžŸαŸ’αžšαŸ„αž˜αž‡αžΆαž“αž·αž…αŸ’αž… αž…αŸαž‰αž‘αžΉαž€αž αžΎαž™ αž‘αŸ…αž•αŸ’αž‘αŸ‡β€‹αžšαŸ€αž„αžαŸ’αž›αž½αž“αŸ• @minealim3 https://t.co/kwrw6Nn0uX

    130302.2K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#αž€αŸ’αžšαž»αž„αžαžΆαžαŸ’αž˜αŸ…

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 118K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 15% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.6K times each, and 0.454% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.40% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 68 interactions, about 8.5x its own typical post.

What is minea_lim's engagement rate on X?
minea_lim (@minealim3) has an engagement rate of 0.006%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 118,101 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.006%, minea_lim sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,656 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @minealim3 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 15% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @minealim3 post?
Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going