Back to @mimirk's profile

Mímir Kristjánsson engagement report

@mimirk - 67K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 21, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.156%
of 67K followers
Per impression
2.79%
3.7K views on a typical post
Reach
5.60%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
104
interactions (median)
Saved
0.027%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.4/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 104 interactions against 67K followers, an engagement rate of 0.156%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.7K times each, and 2.79% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.59% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 63% carry an image or video and 38% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 21K interactions, about 200x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 21, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Mímir Kristjánsson's engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 69% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.156%, Mímir Kristjánsson sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,270 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.146% to 0.695%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.695%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,270 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,455 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.695%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video63% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link38% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 63% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 38% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 222 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 30, 2026200x their median

    Erling Haaland, Norway’s large, maniacal striker, has several exceedingly Norwegian traits. He sometimes exercises by chopping wood in the forest. He consumes 6,000 calories a day. After training sessions, he drinks raw milk. He owns a tax-sheltered investment company in Luxembourg named Pillage. He bought an edition of the “Heimskringla,” a 13th-century Old Norse saga, for $130,000—then donated it to his local library because, he explained, “I’ve never been much of a reader.” He has flowing blond hair, often compared to a Viking’s. He brings the intensity of a raiding party to the sport. Haaland scores goals at a higher rate than almost any soccer player ever. He has said, “I think of football all the time.” His wake-up alarm plays the theme song for the Champions League. He once posted a photo of himself on a plane, staring ahead intensely, with the caption “Just raw dogged a 7 hour flight no phone no sleep no water no food only map.” The Guardian once called him a “ravenous Nordic goal-yeti.” Haaland’s style of play elicits not wonder but terror. He is enormous: six feet five, 200 pounds, about the size and speed of the N.F.L. wide receiver Randy Moss. “Watching him, I sometimes find myself giggling as I might over a big, obscene crash at a demolition derby,” Zach Helfand writes. Read more: https://t.co/iAtLMOvrv0

    18K1.6K3814686.7M viewsView on X
  • Mar 9, 202612x their median

    Dette er altså så spinnvilt! Norad har løst bort 62 bistandsmillioner på å leie inn eventbyråer. https://t.co/WTKanmpXUP

    1.0K1191231638K viewsView on X
  • Feb 10, 202610x their median

    Kanskje Norge snart skal slutte å bruke så mye penger på å kjøpe oss internasjonale topposisjoner? For noen år siden brukte vi 34 millioner kroner på å få en plass i Sikkerhetsrådet. Plassen gikk til den nå korrupsjonssiktede Mona Juul... https://t.co/6KWmqLMviy

    91210049320K viewsView on X
  • Jan 25, 20269.8x their median

    Så det du sier, er at vi har klart å bruke 1/36-del av hva det koster å beskytte hele Nord-Amerika med verdens mest avanserte anti-missilsystem på å bygge tre-fire kontorblokker midt i Oslo? Det regjeringskvartalet er altså så søplete dyrt at det nesten ikke går an å forstå. https://t.co/q7u3j7f9Fd

    9024963552K viewsView on X
  • Feb 4, 20269.5x their median

    Litt ironisk at Hamsundagene nå vurderer å droppe Mette-Marit som sin høye beskytter for å unngå å bli koblet til personer med tvilsomme handlinger på samvittigheten.

    8894454237K viewsView on X
  • Feb 7, 20269.3x their median

    Ine Eriksen Søreide: «Jeg er like overrasket som alle andre over de opplysningene som nå kommer fram i dokumentene». Også Ine Eriksen Søreide: https://t.co/Do0fDQH5nE

    8248854637K viewsView on X
  • Mar 11, 20266.1x their median

    Forsvaret nektes mer kraft til ubåtbasen sin i Ramsund fordi vi har lovet bort all strømmen i nord til grønnvasking av Melkøya og nytt datasenter for OpenAI i Narvik. Heia Norge! https://t.co/qJHd6DeUK4

    5336039317K viewsView on X
  • Feb 11, 20265.1x their median

    Hvis Sylvi Listhaug er så opptatt av åpenhet i politikken, burde hun ikke ha offentliggjort sin egen kundeliste fra First House? Eller gjelder bare åpenhet for alle andre?

    4283363428K viewsView on X
  • Mar 12, 20264.4x their median

    Forbanna over at du må betale så mye penger til banken? Da kommer du til å bli rasende når du får høre hva sjefen i statens egen bank DNB fikk i lønn i fjor. Vanvittige 18,9 millioner kroner! Eller ni ganger mer enn statsministeren og cirka 90 ganger mer enn en minstepensjonist. https://t.co/2hrq3cxOjF

    32347771033K viewsView on X
  • Feb 8, 20263.6x their median

    Dårlig dømmekraft er løsningen på energikrisen. I de norske elitene virker vi til å ha en stabil, fornybar og uttømmelig kilde til dårlig dømmekraft, som forholdsvis raskt vil kunne erstatte alle fosille energikilder.

    3142239425K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 104 interactions against 67K followers, an engagement rate of 0.156%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.7K times each, and 2.79% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.59% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 63% carry an image or video and 38% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 21K interactions, about 200x its own typical post.

What is Mímir Kristjánsson's engagement rate on X?
Mímir Kristjánsson (@mimirk) has an engagement rate of 0.156%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 66,557 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.156%, Mímir Kristjánsson sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,270 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @mimirk have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @mimirk post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going