Back to @middle_class_us's profile

middleclassparty engagement report

@middle_class_us - 67K followers on X

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.276%
of 67K followers
Per impression
6.76%
2.6K views on a typical post
Reach
4.08%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
178
interactions (median)
Saved
0.114%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.3/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 178 interactions against 67K followers, an engagement rate of 0.276%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 66% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.6K times each, and 6.76% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.95% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 212K interactions, about 1190x its own typical post.

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

middleclassparty's engagement rate beats 66% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 91% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.276%, middleclassparty sits above the 50th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.147% to 0.698%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,004 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,390 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 388 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 31, 20251190x their median

    Older generations say “we all struggled in our 20s.” No, you didn’t. You didn’t pay $2,200 for rent and $7 for eggs. You didn’t graduate into $50K student debt and $0 job security. Gen Z isn’t dramatic. They’re drowning.

    173K14K23K1.9K33M viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20269.4x their median

    The middle class doesn't fear expensive things anymore. We fear random Tuesdays. Air conditioner breaks. $1,200. Check engine light. $900. Kid needs something. $600. Dentist. $800. Insurance renewal. Surprise! The luxury isn't having enough money to buy something expensive. It's having enough money that an ordinary problem stays an ordinary problem.

    1.4K182751038K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20268.4x their median

    The cost-of-living crisis has finally found the perfect product. Electricity. You can't stop buying it. You can't buy used electricity. You can't wait for electricity to go on clearance. You can't switch to the generic brand. And in 30 states, energy costs grew faster than incomes from 2020 to 2025. Now roughly 1 in 6 households is behind on energy bills. The ultimate business model: Sell people something they literally cannot live without... Then raise the price faster than their paycheck.

    1.0K2951422227K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20265.7x their median

    Want younger Americans to care about the economy? Give them something to own. A house. A business. Investments. Some actual equity in the future. Because “the stock market hit another record” doesn't mean much to the 29-year-old whose biggest asset is a 2017 Honda Civic. People protect systems they believe they have a stake in. A generation of permanent renters eventually notices who owns everything.

    7521381191315K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20263.8x their median

    We are watching the cost-of-living crisis rewrite American geography. People moved to Florida because it was cheaper. Then Florida got expensive. People moved to Texas because it was cheaper. Then parts of Texas got expensive. Now they're rediscovering the Midwest. Cleveland. Milwaukee. Grand Rapids. Rockford. Apparently the American Dream still exists. You just have to keep moving every time someone finds it.

    5905832026K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20263.6x their median

    The hardest place to live financially might be the middle. You make money. Just not enough. You have a job. Maybe two. You don't qualify for much help. You don't have enough wealth to ignore prices. Every raise removes a benefit. Every expense comes out of your pocket. Every emergency is yours. Rich enough to pay full price. Poor enough to feel every dollar of it.

    5011023649.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20262.5x their median

    We have officially reached the “finance your groceries” stage of the American economy. 1 in 5 Buy Now, Pay Later users used it for groceries or food delivery. Among people who financed groceries this way: 45% said it was the only way they could afford the purchase. Think about that. The food will be gone by Friday. You'll still be making payments on it next month. We used to finance houses. Then cars. Then phones. Now we're financing dinner.

    303806067.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20262.3x their median

    America: You should have work-life balance. Also America: Your rent requires two incomes. Your childcare requires another one. Your retirement needs a side hustle. Your health insurance has a deductible the size of a used Honda. Your groceries require a loyalty program and military-grade coupon strategy. But definitely make time for yourself. Self-care is important.

    294831955.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20262.2x their median

    $30 an hour is $62,400 a year full-time. That used to be amazing. Now? What's your rent? Do you have kids? Car payment? Student loans? Health insurance? Factor all of that in and that salary doesn't cover much. $30 an hour didn't become bad money. Normal life just became way too expensive.

    288654214.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20261.8x their median

    Diesel is now over $6 a gallon in America. Up roughly 70% from a year ago. Don't drive a diesel? Congratulations. You still get to pay for it. The truck bringing food to your grocery store uses diesel. The tractor growing it uses diesel. The truck delivering your Amazon package uses diesel. You don't need to buy diesel for diesel to empty your wallet. It's hiding inside the price of almost everything you buy.

    181666824.9K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 178 interactions against 67K followers, an engagement rate of 0.276%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 66% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.6K times each, and 6.76% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.95% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 212K interactions, about 1190x its own typical post.

What is middleclassparty's engagement rate on X?
middleclassparty (@middle_class_us) has an engagement rate of 0.276%, based on the median interactions across 39 original posts from the last 30 days against 66,587 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.276%, middleclassparty sits above the 50th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @middle_class_us have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 66% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @middle_class_us post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going