Back to @lucas_fraazao's profile

lucas Frazão engagement report

@lucas_fraazao - 297K followers on X

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.044%
of 297K followers
Per impression
0.738%
18K views on a typical post
Reach
5.94%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
130
interactions (median)
Saved
0.006%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.4/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Monday

Early reading. We have captured 3 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 130 interactions against 297K followers, an engagement rate of 0.044%. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 0.738% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.94% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video and 33% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 34K interactions, about 424x its own typical post. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.044%, lucas Frazão sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.147%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,098 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,393 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video33% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 33% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 63 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Mar 18, 2026424x their median

    Essa cena é de um significado TÃO GRANDE pra comunidade LGBT, e ter isso passando no horário nobre é de uma validação enorme! #Tresgraças https://t.co/Qo4Qzx6Ai3

    30K3.5K186338698K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 2026189x their median

    Nossa amigo quis foder com o casal fizemos o melhor sexo a 3 🍆💦💦 https://t.co/IAV7N8Sa0U

    21K3.2K848415K viewsView on X
  • Jul 9, 2023183x their median

    Gosto quando me maceta 😈🔥🔥 @Off_vinicius15 Vídeo completo https://t.co/RGASsNUGso https://t.co/sAfQk10ZE9

    21K2.9K128162.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026151x their median

    Horário de almoço do amigo acabei sendo comido 🍆🤭 https://t.co/RkODHf6o7U

    17K2.1K1055397K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 2026132x their median

    Não resisti tive que gozar dentro 🍆💦💦 https://t.co/mC7PnKzUVe

    15K2.0K637338K viewsView on X
  • Jun 15, 202677x their median

    Meu vizinho bateu aqui em casa dizendo que queria uma mamada 🍆💦💦 https://t.co/kBGH9SXTMP

    9.1K841512312K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202661x their median

    Me chamou pra casa dele tivemos que brincar um pouco 🍆💦💦 https://t.co/7fzaJCNtXp

    6.9K1.0K366165K viewsView on X
  • Mar 9, 202668x their median

    Desculpa, mas não consigo levar a sério um prêmio que pretende contemplar os melhores do ano e, na categoria "Melhor Atriz", não constar o nome de Sophie Charlotte. Com todo respeito às outras excelentes atrizes, todas merecem a indicação, mas a composição que Sophie construiu para Gerluce é, com folga, o trabalho de atuação mais impressionante da temporada. #MelhoresDoAno #TrêsGraças

    4.8K5589238109K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 202641x their median

    Magrinho meteu a rola suculenta no meu cuzinho 💦💦🍆 https://t.co/L3Ri7rt1g6

    5.0K37820390K viewsView on X
  • Jul 9, 202628x their median

    Kiko gostoso em cima do meu pau 🍆🔥 https://t.co/snoORaAeK7

    3.4K273160166K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 130 interactions against 297K followers, an engagement rate of 0.044%. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 0.738% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.94% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video and 33% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 34K interactions, about 424x its own typical post. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is lucas Frazão's engagement rate on X?
lucas Frazão (@lucas_fraazao) has an engagement rate of 0.044%, based on the median interactions across 3 original posts from the last 30 days against 296,595 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.044%, lucas Frazão sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @lucas_fraazao have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @lucas_fraazao post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going