Back to @juntaowang's profile

王军涛 engagement report

@juntaowang - 246K followers on X

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.015%
of 246K followers
Per impression
0.161%
22K views on a typical post
Reach
9.12%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
36
interactions (median)
Saved
0.009%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.73/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Thursday

Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 36 interactions against 246K followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 0.161% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.13% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.73 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 165 interactions, about 4.6x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026. Recurring tag: #习近平访美.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.015%, 王军涛 sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,656 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.697%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,656 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,418 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.697%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 76 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 10, 20264.6x their median

    https://t.co/mRBABcWIXF

    612480015K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20262.6x their median

    https://t.co/szMUGoh0nW

    12477013K viewsView on X
  • Jul 12, 20262.3x their median

    https://t.co/0fhCyaohbs

    24355110K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 2026

    #习近平访美,雇佣打手打压抗议人员,中共特务威胁破坏美国自由安全,#彭丽媛看见我们了#结束#结束中共暴政 https://t.co/79VsfgHC7l

    2176222K viewsView on X
  • Jul 12, 2026

    07.11.2026尊重生命,结束暴政!聲討中共計劃生育大災難 ——中国民主党全国委员会世界人口日特别活动主席聲明 2026年7月11日 纽约时代广场 今天是世界人口日。中国民主党今天在世界的十字路口纽约时代广场举行特别活动,声讨中共人口政策的野蛮实施和造成的严重后果,向所有受害者表达我们的关怀,也向世界揭露中共反人类暴政的本质。 几十年来,中共以国家权力粗暴干预人民生育自由。从”只生一个好”到”放开二孩”“鼓励生育”,政策可以一夜改变,但无数家庭遭受的伤害却无法挽回。 无数妇女被强迫堕胎、强迫绝育;无数家庭因超生被罚得倾家荡产;无数孩子失去出生的权利;无数老人今天又因人口老龄化和出生率下降而面临沉重的社会危机。 这一切并不是天灾,而是专制制度造成的人祸。 一个政府竟然能够决定人民是否可以出生、什么时候生、可以生几个孩子;今天禁止生,明天又要求生。这不仅违背人性,也践踏了生命的尊严,侵犯了最基本的人权。 人口不是数字,而是一个个鲜活的生命;家庭不是国家机器的附属,而是社会最基本、最神圣的共同体。任何政府都没有权力把人民当作实现政治目标和经济目标的工具。 中共人口政策的失败充分说明,一个不受人民监督、不受法律约束的专制政权,最终一定会给国家和人民带来深重灾难。它伤害的不只是几代中国人,也给世界人口发展和人权事业留下了惨痛的教训。 中国民主党郑重宣告:我们要结束这种反人类的暴政,建立一个尊重生命、尊重人权、尊重人格尊严的宪政民主国家。 未来的中国,人民应当依法享有生育自由和家庭自主权;国家应当保护每一个生命,而不是控制每一个生命;政府应当服务人民,而不是支配人民。 今天,我们纪念世界人口日,不只是为了反思过去,更是为了开创未来。 让每一个生命都受到尊重! 让每一个家庭都享有自由! 结束中共暴政! 建设自由、民主、法治的新中国! 王军涛 中国民主党全国委员会主席

    124517.2K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#习近平访美

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 36 interactions against 246K followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 0.161% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.13% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.73 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 165 interactions, about 4.6x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is 王军涛's engagement rate on X?
王军涛 (@juntaowang) has an engagement rate of 0.015%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 245,719 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.015%, 王军涛 sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,656 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @juntaowang have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @juntaowang post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going