Back to @julie_kelly2's profile

Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 engagement report

@julie_kelly2 - 910K followers on X

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.211%
of 910K followers
Per impression
4.57%
42K views on a typical post
Reach
4.61%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.9K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.088%
37 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 1.9K interactions against 910K followers, an engagement rate of 0.211%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 42K times each, and 4.57% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.61% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 74% carry an image or video, 42% are part of a thread and 21% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 427K interactions, about 488x its own typical post.

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Julie Kelly 🇺🇸's engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 88% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.211%, Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 sits above the 50th percentile of the 213,186 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.147% to 0.698%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,186 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,400 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video74% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link21% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 74% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 21% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 428 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Feb 22, 2025488x their median

    Consistent with President @realDonaldTrump’s instructions, all federal employees will shortly receive an email requesting to understand what they got done last week. Failure to respond will be taken as a resignation.

    347K42K27K10K98M viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202659x their median

    Novak Djokovic in his documentary on why he refused the COVID vaccine: "Because I didn't need it. Why should I get the vaccine? I'm healthy, I'm an athlete. I had corona. I had immunity. I wasn't a threat to anyone. There was no reason for me to get vaccinated. It's my freedom to choose which that fundamental right that you have as a human being on this planet — the freedom to choose — which was taken from a lot of people."

    95K15K1.9K1.3K7.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202624x their median

    Novak Djokovic was ridiculed by Bill Gates for not taking the ‘Covid Vaccine’ and not ‘Trusting the Science’…and years later…the Covid Tyrants plead guilty…and are under investigation for the ‘Science’ that they tried forcing him to take… https://t.co/3BsCMxBckA

    36K9.9K441192253K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202611x their median

    I remember seeing people hanging on2 windows pleading 2be rescued. I screamed 2my family, “Someone has to save them!They are alive, save them!” When I saw the fire behind them, the survivors jumped. Some were holding hands 💔 . I was still screaming(as if that was going to help) https://t.co/WHfXYsIjon

    17K3.3K8522333.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 202611x their median

    He’s supposed to be the Attorney General. He’s not supposed to have anything to do with partisan politics. This is so fucking wrong.👇 https://t.co/zd37gMVPaH

    16K4.0K682131370K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20269.1x their median

    🚨 BREAKING: ActBlue cofounder Matt DeBergalis just PANICKED and PLEADED THE 5TH in a closed-door deposition with House committee investigators — Fox News This comes after ActBlue is accused of allowing FOREIGN DONATIONS that INFILTRATE US politics for Democrats, without proper measures to stop it Here's the shocking exchange between Rep. Jim Jordan and an ActBlue official when they also pleaded the 5th. SHUT IT DOWN. JORDAN: Your board chairman said ActBlue accepted up to 38 million contributions in 2024 that had the signs of foreign origin. How much fraud is too much fraud? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: How many foreign contributions did ActBlue accept? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: How much money did ActBlue accept from Russia? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: Why did your entire legal team quit? Your in-house legal team? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: Did your legal team quit because of reduced fraud standards? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: We won't keep you here all day, but let me just do one more. Did you weaken your fraud standards to help Democrats? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution.

    12K4.8K711325802K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20268.0x their median

    Some hilarious stuff in latest DOJ filing in Jim Comey seashell case. It appears Jim and his wife, Patrice (who had attended the Women's March in DC with their daughters after Trump was inaugurated in 2017) set up the entire stunt. She even Googled the slang definition for "86" to make sure his post would be accurate 😂

    11K4.1K20870203K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20267.5x their median

    The FBI framed a sitting US President for treason, dropped an investigation into Eric Swalwell for having an illicit affair with a Chinese spy, planted fake stories with the media and FISA court, and forced Big Tech to censor critics to influence the 2020 election. And some people still don't think the unelected Deep State is real?

    12K2.6K21763169K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20266.9x their median

    Three years ago this month, Joe Biden’s handpicked AG’s handpicked special counsel brought a THIRD federal criminal indictment against President Trump. (Then asked for gag orders on him a year before the election.) That came on top of thousands of federal criminals charges against his supporters. And wide ranging investigations into Trump associates including his own attorneys. Joe Biden’s DOJ hauled dozens of individuals including VP Mike Pence before DC grand juries in search of crimes. We now know 200+ MAGA-tied organizations and donors and influencers were also under DOJ investigation. And Jack Smith—working under the authority of Merrick Garland—found a back door way to obtain text messages of 40+ Republican members of Congress. Not a single member of the media ever confronted Merrick Garland about doing the bidding of Joe Biden. To the contrary, the media lamented that Garland then Jack Smith weren’t working fast enough to put Trump in prison before the 2024 election. No questions about the DOJ’s “independence” from the White House—despite evidence disclosed in the documents case in 2024 that prosecutors were in communication with Biden’s top White House attorneys—including at least two visits to the Biden White House prior to the indictments.

    9.5K3.4K160100157K viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 20266.0x their median

    My hubby and his mini me (our oldest daughter) in line this morning to submit 36k+ signatures to put him on the ballot for Chicago mayor’s race next February. Such a family effort❤️ https://t.co/XFcBw5UBGZ

    10K1.2K2021683K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.9K interactions against 910K followers, an engagement rate of 0.211%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 42K times each, and 4.57% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.61% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 74% carry an image or video, 42% are part of a thread and 21% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 427K interactions, about 488x its own typical post.

What is Julie Kelly 🇺🇸's engagement rate on X?
Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) has an engagement rate of 0.211%, based on the median interactions across 19 original posts from the last 30 days against 910,474 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.211%, Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 sits above the 50th percentile of the 213,186 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @julie_kelly2 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @julie_kelly2 post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going