Back to @jdharm's profile

JD Harmeyer engagement report

@jdharm - 273K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.06%
of 273K followers
Per impression
0.44%
37K views on a typical post
Reach
13.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
163
interactions (median)
Saved
0.005%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.83/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 163 interactions against 273K followers, an engagement rate of 0.06%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 50% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 37K times each, and 0.44% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.83 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 30K interactions, about 190x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #sternshow, #thehowardsternshow, #whodey.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026. Recurring tags: #sternshow, #thehowardsternshow, #whodey.

Compared with accounts its own size

JD Harmeyer's engagement rate beats 50% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 24% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.06%, JD Harmeyer sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,472 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.147%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.699%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,472 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,408 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.699%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video38% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 38% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 107 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 12, 2026190x their median

    Ali G selling weed at the Wimbledon Men’s final lol https://t.co/07BVClpJ4A

    28K9292911433.5M viewsView on X
  • May 25, 201926x their median

    How cool is it to have a photo you took be the Endpaper of a book, let alone a NY Times Best-Seller? Pretty darn cool. #HowardSternComesAgain https://t.co/8NrBwztv7J

    3.8K6743210View on X
  • Aug 29, 202613x their median

    Pete Crow-Armstrong is the 1st Cubs player with at least 4 hits, 3 HR and 6 RBI in a game at Wrigley since George Mitterwald in 1974.

    1.9K1655126247K viewsView on X
  • Jul 4, 202610x their median

    The Nathan’s Famous Hot Dog Eating Contest will be held today on ABC and ESPN Networks. 🌭 Women's comp. | 10:45a ET, ESPN+/ESPN App. 🌭 Men's comp. | Noon, ESPN2 | 12:30p ET, ABC simulcast. https://t.co/a3XCVpSAzO

    1.3K15311729723K viewsView on X
  • Jun 15, 20269.4x their median

    .@jdharm's warm up for his first pitch was a bit of a stumble. https://t.co/4lvHkMb3ZO

    1.1K59028226K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 20263.7x their median

    It is a take a gummy and watch Pink Floyd at Pompeii type of Saturday night

    5501600117K viewsView on X
  • Oct 25, 20262.7x their median

    Tomorrow morning I’m going to be a “horse” with a naked man on my back and that’s still less embarrassing than rooting for the Bengals.

    371759260K viewsView on X
  • Oct 17, 20262.2x their median

    Do not see “You Can See Everything” until you’re ready to have your mind consumed by it for a few days. Holy hell. 👍👍

    320231238K viewsView on X
  • Jul 4, 20262.1x their median

    Come take a history lesson with America’s favorite idiot, Sal Governale! #July4th https://t.co/FhX0sCz4At

    316150360K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20261.8x their median

    All week I had to hear how angry the Texans and their defense would be after losing week 1. Well the Bengals were up for the damn challenge. #WhoDey Onto to Pittsburgh

    258137019K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#sternshow#thehowardsternshow#whodey#bengal#cinatbal

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 163 interactions against 273K followers, an engagement rate of 0.06%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 50% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 37K times each, and 0.44% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.83 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 30K interactions, about 190x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #sternshow, #thehowardsternshow, #whodey.

What is JD Harmeyer's engagement rate on X?
JD Harmeyer (@jdharm) has an engagement rate of 0.06%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 272,946 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.06%, JD Harmeyer sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,472 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @jdharm have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 50% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @jdharm post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.83 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going