Jay Wilkinson engagement report
@jaywilk - 103K followers on X
Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 103K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 3% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 287 times each, and 0.348% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.43 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video and 77% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4 interactions, about 4.0x its own typical post.
Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Jay Wilkinson's engagement rate beats 3% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 17% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.001%, Jay Wilkinson sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,741 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.697% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.8% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 92% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 77% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 92% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 77% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 291 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 12, 20264.0x their median
Sometimes what holds us back isn’t a lack of ability. It’s the story we tell ourselves about what we can or can’t do. Good leaders learn to recognize those assumptions in themselves and help others question the limits they may have accepted too quickly. Growth often begins when we stop treating our first reaction as the final answer. https://t.co/eV3hKo3Lot
- Aug 14, 20264.0x their median
Leadership isn’t just about what we accomplish. It’s also about what happens to the people around us because of how we lead. Do people leave feeling valued, respected and capable? The best leaders don’t need to make themselves smaller to lift others up. https://t.co/9tPAIBHquV https://t.co/vtGqHItF14
- Sep 30, 20263.0x their median
Leadership isn’t only about the moments when we shine. Sometimes it’s about the less visible work: creating clarity, managing ourselves under pressure, and building something that keeps working when we aren’t there. What survives us may say more about our leadership than what we accomplish in the spotlight. https://t.co/FMQRGXLrq0
- Sep 9, 20263.0x their median
Good leadership doesn’t always mean moving faster. Sometimes the better choice is to slow down, listen, ask another question, and give people room to think for themselves. Not every problem needs an immediate answer from the leader. Sometimes people need space to find their own. https://t.co/BbNXA4E9r2
- Oct 13, 20262.0x their median
You can tell people to collaborate. You can create the teams, schedule the meetings, and introduce the tools. But real collaboration depends on something deeper: whether people have the trust, autonomy, and opportunity to learn from one another. Culture shapes what structure alone cannot. https://t.co/5sjS5VhCm8
- Oct 11, 20262.0x their median
Small acts of kindness can have a lasting impact, often in ways we may never see. A little more patience, a moment of encouragement, or taking the time to help someone can make a bigger difference than we realize. https://t.co/fuja5iyaOg
- Oct 4, 20262.0x their median
The way we see a problem can shape the solutions we’re able to see. Sometimes a shift in perspective is enough to uncover possibilities that weren’t visible before. https://t.co/iGenz6B6xo
- Sep 21, 20262.0x their median
Hope in leadership isn’t about assuming everything will work out. It’s about believing there are possibilities ahead and helping people find a way forward when the path isn’t clear. Uncertainty doesn’t disappear. But hope can change how we face it. https://t.co/KGxsUE6MlD https://t.co/mDS8gSsoyt
- Sep 8, 20262.0x their median
Simple ideas are often the ones that travel the furthest. When an idea is clear enough to understand, remember, and explain to someone else, it has a much better chance of becoming action. Simple doesn’t mean easy. It means clear. https://t.co/Jxeih5nbhF https://t.co/kfJdGexGh6
- Aug 27, 20262.0x their median
Compassionate leadership doesn’t mean protecting people from every difficult consequence. We can care about people, give second chances, and still hold high standards. Sometimes the most compassionate thing we can do is support people while allowing them to take responsibility for what happens next. https://t.co/nKvzdsOuIK
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 103K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 3% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 287 times each, and 0.348% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.43 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video and 77% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4 interactions, about 4.0x its own typical post.
- What is Jay Wilkinson's engagement rate on X?
- Jay Wilkinson (@jaywilk) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 102,590 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.001%, Jay Wilkinson sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,741 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @jaywilk have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 3% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @jaywilk post?
- Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.43 posts per day across the measured window.