Back to @itsJeffTiedrich's profile

Jeff Tiedrich engagement report

@itsJeffTiedrich - 1.1M followers on X

Measured over 67 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.034%
of 1.1M followers
Per impression
2.20%
17K views on a typical post
Reach
1.55%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
364
interactions (median)
Saved
0.018%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.37/day
active 103% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 364 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.034%. Measured over 67 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 2.20% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.55% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 67 posts sampled, 51% carry an image or video and 96% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.0K interactions, about 22x its own typical post.

Measured over 67 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Jeff Tiedrich's engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 69% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.034%, Jeff Tiedrich sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,925 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9983.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,925 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,436 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video51% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link96% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 51% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 96% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 282 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 27, 202622x their median

    pro tip: if you worship Dear Leader for being a billionaire, born into obscene wealth, and living in a golden tower, but it's Obama you're mad at, for having pulled himself up by his bootstraps into a nice life, you might just be a fucking racist

    7.0K85993363K viewsView on X
  • Oct 16, 20265.8x their median

    ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha oops I mean how sad for Katie Zacharia

    2.0K8925026K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20265.7x their median

    can we just set up a fake Oval Bordello where Donny can pretend to be president and play patty-cake with his diaper nurse and stay out of trouble? FUN TRUE FACT: that's exactly what Donny's family did for his demented father Fred. thank you for your attention, etc. link is here: https://t.co/dmHy5s8Z0F

    1.7K36511429K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20265.1x their median

    can't wait for there to be a Democratic president so the Supreme Court can start saying 'no' again

    1.7K12014032K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20265.0x their median

    here's today's post: "no one gives a shit about your White House helipad, you out-of-touch fuck" — fix the country you broke, asshole. thanks for reading, and please sign up for my daily newsletter to keep getting the good stuff — https://t.co/wPcwBGQXZr https://t.co/wPcwBGQXZr

    1.5K32413329K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20264.8x their median

    Preznit Fuckwit tried to bully Canada into accepting a shitty trade deal, and it blew up right in his fat waterlogged face. thank you for your attention to today's post, in which I mock the shit out of Dear Leader's eternal brain-dead incompetence. link is here: https://t.co/9sscWUzxHz

    1.4K31427533K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20264.7x their median

    here's Monday's post: "no one gives a shit about your Grand Prix race, you out-of-touch fuck" — fix the country you broke, imbecile. thanks for reading, and please sign up for my daily newsletter to keep getting the good stuff — https://t.co/IiRFy3cIpV https://t.co/IiRFy3cIpV

    1.4K26318029K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20264.1x their median

    Donny's Diaper Nurse Natalie was getting a little too much press, so Dear Leader's minders paid Melania some extra money to be photographed holding the hand of the husband she hates. thank you for your attention to today's post, in which I explain it all. link is here: https://t.co/lVkn8T8zLn

    1.2K30815330K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20263.8x their median

    Donny has clownfucked himself into unwinnable wars against Canada and Iran, and it's broken his what's left of his rotting brain. boo fucking hoo, Donny. thank you for your attention to today's post, in which I mock that shit and also say goodbye to Dolly Parton. link is here: https://t.co/3SnZ2T3GYf

    1.1K23510031K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20263.5x their median

    MAGA loves to whine about inflation under Joe Biden, but they all seem to have forgotten that Biden inherited an utter economic shambles that Donny created, and fixed it faster than any other country. thank you for your attention to today's post, in which I explain it. link is here: https://t.co/X94UKUdO7N

    90833512423K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 364 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.034%. Measured over 67 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 2.20% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.55% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 67 posts sampled, 51% carry an image or video and 96% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.0K interactions, about 22x its own typical post.

What is Jeff Tiedrich's engagement rate on X?
Jeff Tiedrich (@itsJeffTiedrich) has an engagement rate of 0.034%, based on the median interactions across 67 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,066,222 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.034%, Jeff Tiedrich sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,925 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @itsJeffTiedrich have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @itsJeffTiedrich post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going