Back to @iaragb's profile

ℹ️IaraGB 🐒💨L🌻👉🇧🇷 engagement report

@iaragb - 157K followers on X

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.311%
of 157K followers
Per impression
12.4%
3.9K views on a typical post
Reach
2.51%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
480
interactions (median)
Saved
0.103%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.57/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 480 interactions against 157K followers, an engagement rate of 0.311%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.9K times each, and 12.4% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.46% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.1K interactions, about 13x its own typical post.

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

ℹ️IaraGB 🐒💨L🌻👉🇧🇷's engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 98% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.311%, ℹ️IaraGB 🐒💨L🌻👉🇧🇷 sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,482 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.146% to 0.696%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.696%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,482 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,403 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.696%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video89% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link5% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 89% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 5% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 261 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 23, 202613x their median

    Segundo a velha imprensa e a militância esquerdista e “isentona”, essas reuniões na verdade eram para o @jairbolsonaro e @FlavioBolsonaro ! https://t.co/Zj2iN82s3Z

    4.5K1.5K262254K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 202611x their median

    FLÁVIO ENCERRA O PERÍODO DE CAMPANHA EM NATAL. Veja as imagens. https://t.co/zAA43zZ9tc

    3.7K1.3K533722K viewsView on X
  • Jan 28, 20269.6x their median

    Em 26/04/2024 o governo federal participa da inauguração da Biomm do Vorcaro‼️ “Quando eu conheci o Valfrido eu não gostava de banqueiro, daí eu conheci o Zé Luiz na casa do Valfrido, eu falei, banqueiro não é tão ruim assim não… E quando fui me despedir ganhei da esposa do Ze Luiz uma cachorra, maravilhosa, que viveu comigo e com a DiIma também…” Tirem suas conclusões, de tempo e situação. Vorcaro é o maior acionista individual da farmacêutica.

    2.9K1.6K8074127K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20269.0x their median

    Acabei de sair do supermercado Favorito e um senhorzinho bem simpático me deu boa tarde; eu retribuí o cumprimento. Daí ele soltou: “Ontem saí de casa e estava a maior confusão, fiquei duas horas na manifestação.” Logo pensei: lá vem um petista… Para minha surpresa, ele continuou: “esperando a manifestação passar, de tão grande que era.”😁 Eu dei um sorrisão. Ele perguntou meu nome; respondi e perguntei o dele. “Xavier”, disse segurando minha mão. “Vamos vencer essa.” Ganhei o fim de tarde‼️ É Flávio na boca do povo em Natal‼️😍

    3.7K569551033K viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 20254.9x their median

    Quer dizer que Lula se reuniu com Departamento de Estado Americano antes das eleições em 2022⁉️ Por que agora não quer ter interlocução com os EUA⁉️ Resolver assuntos de interesse das eleições estava ok pedir interferência dos EUA⁉️ https://t.co/kGLhWNOP5A

    1.4K874242814K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20264.7x their median

    Hahahahahahaha pegando fogo no clube Macallan‼️ Messias e Andrei trocaram xingamentos, por que o AGU descobriu que estava sendo espionado. https://t.co/fI0taZaM8m

    1.6K581451918K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20264.4x their median

    Flávio movimentando o Maranhão como nunca se viu‼️ É Dino… sua terra não concorda com você. https://t.co/b5G0bmwqjR

    1.5K58119106.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20263.8x their median

    Esse é o nível de um petista. Não há compaixão com nenhum ser humano. https://t.co/HVZM4qTIQI

    1.3K37888278.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20262.8x their median

    Vorcaro comprou toda a justiça do país‼️ O desembargador Newton Pereira Ramos Neto, do TRF-1, deu votos favoráveis a interesses ligados ao Banco Master em um processo bilionário envolvendo precatórios e indenizações do SUCROALCOOLEIRO de uma usina em Alagoas. Meses depois, a esposa do magistrado firmou contrato com advogados ligados Vorcaro, prevendo honorários que poderiam chegar a R$ 427 milhões em caso de êxito judicial.

    81147229125.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20262.7x their median

    Lula saiu do Brasil para fazer campanha na ONU⁉️ Percebe-se que ele não tem limites e trafega fora da diplomacia e dos protocolos do evento global. Pega mal para ele. Os chefes de Estado não entenderam “tchongas” e se perguntam que discurso foi esse. É o retrato da decadência institucional do país. A única “vacina” que ele deu pegou no lugar errado e não fez nenhuma diferença. Trump está kgando para ele‼️ https://t.co/oScnN19yca

    94732816812K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 480 interactions against 157K followers, an engagement rate of 0.311%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.9K times each, and 12.4% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.46% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.1K interactions, about 13x its own typical post.

What is ℹ️IaraGB 🐒💨L🌻👉🇧🇷's engagement rate on X?
ℹ️IaraGB 🐒💨L🌻👉🇧🇷 (@iaragb) has an engagement rate of 0.311%, based on the median interactions across 37 original posts from the last 30 days against 157,361 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.311%, ℹ️IaraGB 🐒💨L🌻👉🇧🇷 sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,482 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @iaragb have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @iaragb post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going