Back to @gulbakim_'s profile

Halil Varlı ( GüLBakim ) engagement report

@gulbakim_ - 115K followers on X

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.249%
of 115K followers
Per impression
0.862%
33K views on a typical post
Reach
28.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
288
interactions (median)
Saved
0.275%
92 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.7/day
active 73% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 288 interactions against 115K followers, an engagement rate of 0.249%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 33K times each, and 0.862% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 29.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 43K interactions, about 149x its own typical post.

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Halil Varlı ( GüLBakim )'s engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 37% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.249%, Halil Varlı ( GüLBakim ) sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,656 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.146% to 0.697%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.697%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,656 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,418 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.697%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video50% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 50% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 777 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 25, 2026149x their median

    Kıbrıs’ı almış, apoyu yakalatıp içeri tıkmış Adamı bir yazar kasa iktidardan etmişti. Her şeyi satıp apoyu salan adamaysa emekli vatandaş canına kıymışken laf bile edilemiyor. Tarihin en büyük ahlaki ve vicdani erezyonu.

    38K4.5K13152444K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 2026141x their median

    Bir vatandaş, dükkânına “Sıvasız evden çıkan çocuk şehit oldu. Ö-ldüren piçin payına villa düştü.” yazılı bir kâğıt astı. https://t.co/gZkmj2ctR8

    37K3.6K9539800K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 202631x their median

    Ruhi Çenet bizim ülkenin mizah seviyesini arşa çıkarttı. https://t.co/NShf1k14No

    8.1K81211456602K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 202625x their median

    Beymen’den mi aldınız işkembeyi? 😀 https://t.co/fZy4qXAzdM

    6.8K10021270809K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202623x their median

    https://t.co/8war4syk5v

    6.7K3196106K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 202622x their median

    Kendi imkanlarıyla oyun konsolu üreten bir genç, “Canbox” adını verdiği konsolunu sosyal medya üzerinden tanıttı. 🔹 “Kablonun ucunu powerbank’e takıyoruz ve Canbox yazıyor.” 🔹 “İçinde 5 tane oyun var.” https://t.co/CyUQgeUMVj

    5.9K116208771.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202615x their median

    ülkenin hali acınası https://t.co/K0eMbEA4Fo

    4.1K5915917273K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20263.1x their median

    Eski iyi partili Yavuz Ağıralioğlu: “DEM partisinde 29 MIT görevlisi Milletvekili var, Bunlar ailesiyle birlikte MIT'e hizmet ediyor.” https://t.co/ABdK1yqwpr

    7311252514301K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20261.9x their median

    Théorie HxH : Les 6 catégories de Nen sont liées aux 6 calamités du Continent Noir Et si le Nen n'était pas une invention humaine, mais simplement une adaptation de forces bien plus anciennes ? Ma théorie est que les six catégories de Nen proviennent des six Calamités du Continent Noir. Chacune représenterait l'expression parfaite d'une catégorie de Nen, dont les humains n'ont appris qu'une version limitée. - Amélioration → Zobae : vitalité et régénération dépassant toutes les limites naturelles. - Émission → Ai : une existence capable d'agir à distance de son propre corps, presque comme une aura autonome. - Manipulation → Hellbell : contrôle des instincts, du comportement et de la volonté. - Transmutation → Pap : la transformation profonde de la nature même des êtres vivants. - Conjuration → Brion : une forme de vie existant quelque part entre un objet et un organisme vivant. - Spécialisation → une sixième Calamité inconnue : une entité qui transcenderait toutes les autres catégories et posséderait des capacités impossibles à expliquer par les règles conventionnelles du Nen. Le fait que le Nen compte six catégories alors que seules cinq Calamités sont connues à ce jour pourrait être un indice laissé par Togashi. Il pourrait exister une sixième Calamité correspondant à la Spécialisation.

    4665919523K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 2026

    Yeğenim (5 yaşında) bugün kreşten gelince "kreş nasıldı" diye sordum. "Hayır okula orası kreş değil" dedi. Ben de Nişanyan Sözlüğü çıkartıp kendisine kreş kelimesinin "gündüz çocukların alınıp bırakıldığı yer" olduğunu gösterdim. Şu an dünyanın en kötü dayısıyım.

    279220310K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 288 interactions against 115K followers, an engagement rate of 0.249%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 33K times each, and 0.862% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 29.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 43K interactions, about 149x its own typical post.

What is Halil Varlı ( GüLBakim )'s engagement rate on X?
Halil Varlı ( GüLBakim ) (@gulbakim_) has an engagement rate of 0.249%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 115,098 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.249%, Halil Varlı ( GüLBakim ) sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,656 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @gulbakim_ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @gulbakim_ post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.7 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going