Back to @gucci_fuufu's profile

ぐっち夫婦@料理家 engagement report

@gucci_fuufu - 243K followers on X

Measured over 64 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.086%
of 243K followers
Per impression
0.954%
22K views on a typical post
Reach
8.99%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
210
interactions (median)
Saved
0.37%
82 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.3/day
active 100% of days
Peak time
03:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 210 interactions against 243K followers, an engagement rate of 0.086%. Measured over 64 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 0.954% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.04% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 64 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 48% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.2K interactions, about 5.7x its own typical post.

Measured over 64 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

ぐっち夫婦@料理家's engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 41% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.086%, ぐっち夫婦@料理家 sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,282 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.147%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,282 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,403 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video58% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link48% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 58% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 48% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 135 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Mar 21, 20225.7x their median

    【LINEでレシピ検索できます✨】 トーク画面から「食材名」を入力して レシピを検索できるようになりました! 👉 https://t.co/yp8vSm2jhp https://t.co/SV8S4R6jb3

    1.1K972114View on X
  • Aug 30, 20265.6x their median

    粒マスタード、買ったはいいけど なかなか減らない…って人にこれ! ハニーマスタードチキン。 香ばしく焼いた鶏肉に、 はちみつ×粒マスタードの 甘酸っぱいソースをじゅわっ。 ごはんにもパンにも合う、 家族ウケ間違いなし! https://t.co/9SHyAltgyo

    1.1K1210558K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20263.6x their median

    これ、豚ロースがびっくりするほど やわらかい! やわらか!豚ロースの梅肉焼き。 こんがり焼いた豚ロースに、 梅の酸味と甘辛い味わいが じゅわっと絡んで絶品♪ 薄力粉をまぶして焼くから、 お肉はしっとりやわらか、 たれもしっかり絡む! いつもの豚ロースが、 ごちそうおかずに変身^^ https://t.co/NNCoIW0iEe

    680662030K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20263.5x their median

    さつまいも好きにはたまらない^^ さつまいも蒸しパン。 ほくほく甘いさつまいもがゴロゴロ入って、 ひと口食べればほっこり幸せ♪ レンチンで作れるからとってもお手軽◎ おやつや朝ごはんにもぴったり^^ https://t.co/VHsPG39Pxm

    679610133K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20263.5x their median

    ピーマン、レンチンして和えるだけで こんなにおいしくなる^^ ピーマンとツナの香り塩昆布和え。 シャキッと食感のピーマンに、 ツナのコクと塩昆布の旨みがじんわり。 仕上げのごま油が香って、 シンプルなのに箸が止まらない♪ あと一品ほしいときにもおすすめ◎ https://t.co/rfqBTYVciY

    664651031K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20263.2x their median

    なすがおいしい季節に、これ作って! とろけるなすのめんつゆ焼き。 香ばしく焼いたなすは、とろっとやわらか。 めんつゆの旨みをたっぷり吸って、 噛むたびにじゅわ〜っとおいしさが広がる。 かつお節の香りも相性抜群。 忙しい日の副菜にぴったり! https://t.co/4zRDg10PeL

    609640035K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20263.1x their median

    家族みんなが喜ぶ、カレー味^^ たっぷりなすとウインナーのカレーピラフ。 なすとウインナーがたっぷり入って栄養満点! フライパンひとつで作れるのに、 野菜もごはんもしっかり楽しめるのが嬉しい! 夏休みランチにもおすすめ! https://t.co/2tNvgVNcKy

    597560144K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20263.1x their median

    レンチンだけで完成! 火を使わずごちそうができるの、神すぎる! 鶏肉とかぼちゃの甘辛煮。 ほくほく甘いかぼちゃと、 やわらかジューシーな鶏肉に、 甘辛だれがじゅわっと絡んで、 ごはんが止まらないおいしさ! ラクなのに、しっかり味しみ! https://t.co/uMAOLrs98x

    577671230K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20263.1x their median

    ピーマンが苦手でも、これなら食べたくなる! 豚ピーマンチーズ巻き。 チーズを入れたピーマンを 豚肉で包んで焼いたら、 外は香ばしく、中はチーズがとろ〜り。 味付けは焼肉のたれだけだから、 忙しい日でもパパッと作れる。 https://t.co/KZQYfjlAX1

    570710237K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20262.9x their median

    暑い日は、さっぱりおかずがうれしい! 揚げずに作れる、鶏むねの焼き南蛮漬け。 しっとり鶏むね肉に、シャキシャキ野菜と 酸味のきいた南蛮だれが絡んで、 ごはんがすすむおいしさ^^ 冷やしてもおいしいから、 作っておけば忙しい日の一品にも◎ https://t.co/DOmb2SnKh2

    531700227K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 210 interactions against 243K followers, an engagement rate of 0.086%. Measured over 64 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 0.954% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.04% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 64 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 48% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.2K interactions, about 5.7x its own typical post.

What is ぐっち夫婦@料理家's engagement rate on X?
ぐっち夫婦@料理家 (@gucci_fuufu) has an engagement rate of 0.086%, based on the median interactions across 64 original posts from the last 30 days against 243,453 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.086%, ぐっち夫婦@料理家 sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,282 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @gucci_fuufu have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @gucci_fuufu post?
Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going