Back to @graciebon1's profile

gracie bon engagement report

@graciebon1 - 1.2M followers on X

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.531%
of 1.2M followers
Per impression
3.10%
214K views on a typical post
Reach
17.1%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
6.6K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.488%
1.0K bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.87/day
active 73% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 6.6K interactions against 1.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.531%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 214K times each, and 3.10% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.87 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 122K interactions, about 16x its own typical post.

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

gracie bon's engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 79% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.531%, gracie bon sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,925 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.146% to 0.698%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9983.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,925 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,436 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 62 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Mar 22, 202416x their median

    i guess i’ll just take my things and go https://t.co/pJTpswpi4V

    105K16K2251.1K5.8M viewsView on X
  • Jul 3, 202312x their median

    https://t.co/Qn5E4ODNCg

    69K6.4K3.7K4.5K32M viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202612x their median

    my body scan, can’t wait for GTA 6 on November 19th. thank you @rockstargames for making one of my biggest dreams come true. this is for all the gorditas in the world, we are finally being included in the BIGGEST game ever 🙏🏼 https://t.co/hCGgGdrBEG

    71K2.9K2.2K1.0K9.7M viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 20237.9x their median

    me and who https://t.co/77t67yCeqR

    46K8.7K1791.2K3.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20265.3x their median

    how thick is too thick? https://t.co/N84C6PznXz

    33K1.1K776893.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20265.2x their median

    would you come to a date with me wearing this dress? https://t.co/wtyePC3UYj

    32K1.1K743311.1M viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20265.0x their median

    this is how I have to sleep btw https://t.co/9uqWAidSeP

    31K1.1K576391.5M viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20263.7x their median

    is my body too big? https://t.co/umCxnOmqHI

    23K81354424519K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20263.6x their median

    fully clothed… and curvy… so you probably won’t say hi https://t.co/YqnsplpBwq

    22K83574238622K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20263.4x their median

    i can explain but i think it would be funnier if i didn’t https://t.co/vpDXnkFssx

    22K70331014525K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 6.6K interactions against 1.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.531%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 214K times each, and 3.10% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.87 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 122K interactions, about 16x its own typical post.

What is gracie bon's engagement rate on X?
gracie bon (@graciebon1) has an engagement rate of 0.531%, based on the median interactions across 25 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,246,735 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.531%, gracie bon sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,925 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @graciebon1 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @graciebon1 post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going