George Stock engagement report
@georgesttock - 48K followers on X
Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 225 interactions against 48K followers, an engagement rate of 0.468%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 62% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.3K times each, and 2.72% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.8K interactions, about 7.9x its own typical post.
Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
George Stock's engagement rate beats 62% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 4 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 62% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.468%, George Stock sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,349 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.146% to 0.696%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.696% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 83.1% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 497 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 14, 20267.9x their median
I cracked the code. Most people struggle with AI video prompts. The trick isn't writing more — it's writing structured. I use Claude to turn a simple idea into a full JSON-style prompt: scene, character, camera movement, timing, negative prompts, all mapped out. That structure is the difference between "obviously AI" and something that looks real. Once you have the format, it's stupidly easy to make consistently realistic videos, over and over. Want the exact JSON prompt structure I use? Comment "WANT" and I'll send it over
- Oct 8, 20266.5x their median
Seedance 2.5 just went unlimited on MakeUGC. Unlimited videos, no per-generation cost - 100/200 free credits - Every model included - 10 min processing per video Limited time only. If you've got ad ideas sitting untested, now's the window. I'm also sending a prompt guide + template guide with it. Comment "GUIDE" and I'll send all three 👇
- Dec 9, 20255.3x their median
We Just Destroyed a $7 Billion Industry - With 1 AI Agent @makeugc Just launched a supercharged Ad Agent - so you can steal your competitors in clicks - then recreate them with AI Before creating, editing and uploading ads would take 10-14 days. Now you can create - Product in hand AI UGC - Access 500+ creators - Auto-edit with this agent in minutes 1 in 2, million-dollar businesses are using AI ads Success isn’t luck, it's a proven $100m+ formula RT + Comment “MakeUGC” and I’ll send it to you (must follow for dm)
- Sep 7, 20262.9x their median
Here's how I create hyper-realistic AI UGC that actually stops the scroll: → Source real faces & locations from Pinterest for reference → Study viral TikTok hooks — the pacing, the framing, the delivery → Run it through Seedance using both as reference The prompt structure: "Replace the girl in {viral hook} with {reference girl}, in {reference location}. She says: {vocal hook}. iPhone quality, handheld movement, FaceTime-with-a-friend energy, no text on screen." That's it. The realism comes from the references, not the model alone. Want the full breakdown? Comment "WORKFLOW" and I'll send it over
- Sep 9, 20262.9x their median
I cracked the code. Most people struggle with AI video prompts. The trick isn't writing more — it's writing structured. I use Claude to turn a simple idea into a full JSON-style prompt: scene, character, camera movement, timing, negative prompts, all mapped out. That structure is the difference between "obviously AI" and something that looks real. Once you have the format, it's stupidly easy to make consistently realistic videos, over and over. Want the exact JSON prompt structure I use? Comment "WANT" and I'll send it over
- Oct 7, 20262.8x their median
Seedance 2.0 = 550+ videos a day Fully realistic UGC ads — cinematic lighting, natural movement, clean pacing — all powered by AI. I’ve got this crazy workflow running right now that creates, tests, and scales short-form ads automatically... nonstop. It’s already live and campaigns are scaling. If you want me to share the full setup, just comment “UGC” (must be following)
- Oct 15, 20262.2x their median
I just cracked AI ads — and the numbers are ridiculous. Built a pipeline using Claude as the director and Seedance 2.5 as the animation engine, turning any flat product photo into a studio-quality video ad. Hook: explains the problem in 2 seconds Cost: pennies compared to traditional UGC Scale: 15x your creative output overnight Images → Seedance 2.5 → AI voiceover → music → editing. One automated workflow, all inside MakeUGC. Want the blueprint? Comment “MAKEUGC” and I’ll DM you the full breakdown (must be following)
- Oct 9, 20261.9x their median
Missed this yesterday? You're not missing it today. Seedance 2.5 just went unlimited on MakeUGC, and I'm making sure everyone gets this one. - 100/200 free credits - Every model included - 10 min processing per video - Unlimited videos, no per-generation cost Limited time only. If you've got ad ideas sitting untested, now's the window. I'm also sending a prompt guide + template guide with it. Comment "FREE" and I'll send all three
- Oct 16, 20261.8x their median
pixar style AI UGC makes me $3M a year with my ecom brand... i just broke down exactly how to create them + 2 other amazing formats. the article below covers: - scripting - angle ideation - the full build workflow - softwares/tools to use - etc Want the guide? Comment "AI" and I'll DM it to you (go read it)
- Oct 10, 20261.7x their median
Seedance 2.5 just went unlimited on MakeUGC. Unlimited videos, no per-generation cost - 100/200 free credits - Every model included - 10 min processing per video Limited time only. If you've got ad ideas sitting untested, nows the window. Im also sending a prompt guide + template guide with it. Comment GUIDE and Ill send all three 👇
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 225 interactions against 48K followers, an engagement rate of 0.468%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 62% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.3K times each, and 2.72% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.8K interactions, about 7.9x its own typical post.
- What is George Stock's engagement rate on X?
- George Stock (@georgesttock) has an engagement rate of 0.468%, based on the median interactions across 22 original posts from the last 30 days against 48,079 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.468%, George Stock sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,349 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @georgesttock have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 62% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @georgesttock post?
- Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.13 posts per day across the measured window.