Freddy Vega engagement report
@freddier - 317K followers on X
Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 366 interactions against 317K followers, an engagement rate of 0.116%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 62% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 1.80% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.40% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video, 12% are part of a thread and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.9K interactions, about 11x its own typical post.
Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Freddy Vega's engagement rate beats 62% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 59% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.116%, Freddy Vega sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,656 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.697% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.9% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 50% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 8% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 50% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 8% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 282 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 5, 202611x their median
GTA VI will become a museum to the last grand 100% human-made digital world. A monument to the level of care and detail created only by people.
- Sep 25, 20268.4x their median
We need to pace the frontier. I’ve had this fucking song stuck in my head all day. https://t.co/fVi7BviXgt
- Oct 5, 20267.8x their median
I think Digger's low review score is a reflection of the academic collapse of humanity in general. The movie is a risky achievement in telling the truth about how we use art to justify our lack of action. But... it takes a while to pay off. You wouldn't get it if you disconnected from the movie early on. It demands attention to detail, focus. Iñárritu and Tom Cruise respected the audience's intelligence and paid the price.
- Sep 29, 20263.7x their median
Mr Robot is a very important TV show. A visual museum of what hackers were like before LLMs.
- Oct 12, 20262.2x their median
I'm not sure what to teach you guys. Every day I learn incredible things that become irrelevant fast: self-improving company loops in Claude Code, messaging between Codex and Claude, quirky SVG animations, new ways to research. But... every AI experience feels isolated to me, as if it's only useful for me and no one else. On top of that, my token access is wildly different from most people's. Frontier AI is, for now, a privilege. I'm too much in my own head. I'd love to know what you haven't mastered and truly want to. It would help me, and all of us at Platzi, teach you better 💚
- Oct 2, 20262.0x their median
I run an LLM offline on my laptop. A heavily quantized Qwen3.6, using LMStudio. MBP M4 Max 36GB RAM. It does 8-12 tokens per second. The context window is quite small (like 4000 tokens), but it's good enough for quick science/tech questions or helping me do a high-level grammar and narrative check while writing. I use it on flights with no wifi. It eats a LOT of battery life and gives me an eerie scifi feeling. I can tap all human knowledge, with no internet connection, in my "above average" laptop, compressed into 20GB. It's as easy as installing LMStudio and downloading the weights from HuggingFace.
- Aug 24, 20262.0x their median
Last weekend, I burned $1k in a failed experiment with Fable 5/Opus 5. So I switched to Codex out of anger. I've been working only with Codex and GPT 5.6 Sol this week. I'm loving the lack of weird English, the great /goal command, its nicer UI and "Fast mode". I may downgrade my Claude subscription.
- Sep 23, 20261.9x their median
Opus 5.5 is a really scary model * fast * writes very well * less usage consumption vs Fable 5.1 * creative The next weeks, we're going to see really impressive demos and a lot of startups that will need to pivot. I gotta get to work.
- Sep 22, 20261.9x their median
No one is paying the true price of AI. OpenAI and Anthropic subsidize the cost per token in the subscription. Sometimes at 40x to 70x rates. Yeah, seventy times real price. Uber did the same when they started. Anthropic will IPO this year. OpenAI next year. After that, probably, we’ll start to see the actual price per token. Or… the math would improve and it’ll get cheaper 🤷
- Sep 26, 2026
What's the best city in Latin America to work remotely? https://t.co/utbydCwwbu
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 366 interactions against 317K followers, an engagement rate of 0.116%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 62% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 1.80% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.40% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video, 12% are part of a thread and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.9K interactions, about 11x its own typical post.
- What is Freddy Vega's engagement rate on X?
- Freddy Vega (@freddier) has an engagement rate of 0.116%, based on the median interactions across 26 original posts from the last 30 days against 317,294 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.116%, Freddy Vega sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,656 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @freddier have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 62% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @freddier post?
- Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.93 posts per day across the measured window.