Foodporn engagement report
@food_porn - 200K followers on X
Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 28 interactions against 200K followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 27% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.6K times each, and 0.427% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.27% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.6K interactions, about 200x its own typical post.
Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Foodporn's engagement rate beats 27% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 23% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.014%, Foodporn sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,381 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.147% |
| 75th percentile | 0.699% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.9% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 148 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 28, 2026200x their median
Did you know how sardines are canned in Portugal? ππ΅πΉπ€·π½ββοΈ https://t.co/h0qrPSqDG1
- Sep 18, 2026196x their median
Chef shows us how to expertly break down a chicken πππ€― With @walkingigloo https://t.co/t7Khcd7Wnt
- Aug 27, 2026189x their median
Catching durian from the tree tops looks like so much fun! π€―π«ͺ With ΰΈ‘ΰΈΰΈͺ https://t.co/DKPyLE2wJY
- Sep 20, 2026142x their median
Weβre at @krispypizza_ to see how they make pizza right! 100% πππ― https://t.co/nKUSzaWckH
- Sep 21, 2026113x their median
Would you eat cicada nymphs? πͺ²π€·π½ββοΈ In parts of China, cicada nymphs have been eaten for centuries and are considered a seasonal delicacy, particularly in provinces such as Shandong, Henan and Zhejiang. They are fried until crisp, with their flavour commonly described as nutty or savoury.
- Oct 8, 202643x their median
Weβre at Lumi Dining to watch Chef Federico make his famous seafood taglionlini π€―π₯ https://t.co/obSI7KutOy
- Sep 4, 202640x their median
What is he makingβ¦ Friday edition! π€·π½ββοΈ Wrong answers only π https://t.co/Wga8FcdB4n
- Sep 23, 202637x their median
Weβre harvesting bananas in Bangladesh ππ€― https://t.co/yEUVmOCrn7
- Oct 2, 202626x their median
We watch Turkish Simit bread being made πΉπ·π₯¨π€― Would you try it? π€·π½ββοΈ With @mastercheef9 https://t.co/AhoDwskFLD
- Aug 17, 202618x their median
Have you ever had a New Mexican chile relleno?! π₯π€·π½ββοΈ @taoschef2021 shows us how he makes them! π€― https://t.co/4c4ZFkAvaJ
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 28 interactions against 200K followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 27% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.6K times each, and 0.427% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.27% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.6K interactions, about 200x its own typical post.
- What is Foodporn's engagement rate on X?
- Foodporn (@food_porn) has an engagement rate of 0.014%, based on the median interactions across 47 original posts from the last 30 days against 200,249 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.014%, Foodporn sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,381 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @food_porn have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 27% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @food_porn post?
- Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.57 posts per day across the measured window.