Back to @firefox's profile

Firefox engagement report

@firefox - 2.1M followers on X

Measured over 6 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.152%
of 2.1M followers
Per impression
1.57%
205K views on a typical post
Reach
9.71%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.115%
235 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.73/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Wednesday

Early reading. We have captured 6 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 3.2K interactions against 2.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.152%. Posts are seen about 205K times each, and 1.57% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.71% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.73 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 6 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 33% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 484K interactions, about 159x its own typical post. Only 6 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 6 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026. Recurring tag: #ad.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.152%, Firefox sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,078 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.146% to 0.694%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.694%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,078 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,460 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.694%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video50% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 50% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 251 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Dec 18, 2024159x their median

    just accidentally closed a tab i've had been meaning to read for the past 2 years

    444K35K1.7K2.7K8.3M viewsView on X
  • Oct 25, 202625x their median

    How is the internet less private than in 2006, when the whole family shared one computer? Back then, the internet was weird, personal, and all of ours. So, we got your favorite meme legends back together to say it louder: What happened to the internet? 1/3 https://t.co/t0Ar1FwzQD

    72K6.3K8821.9K4.1M viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20265.9x their median

    We took time off of X, but we’re back. The internet is changing again, so we’re here as an independent voice for our users and the open internet.

    16K7222.2K3533.2M viewsView on X
  • Oct 22, 20262.1x their median

    We're sad to hear Arc is sunsetting later this year; we're big fans of what @arcinternet set out to do & achieved. Arc's innovations influenced some of our own features: Sidebar, Split View, and the upcoming Mini Window. If you're currently an Arc user, what features do you want to see in your next browser?

    6.1K19924848259K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20261.9x their median

    for no apparent reason at all, i would like to inform everyone that firefox just launched an in-browser VPN

    5.5K500913404K viewsView on X
  • Dec 6, 20244.4x their median

    Just a reminder that you can still use ad blockers on Firefox 🤷‍♀️

    5.1K54221053178K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 2026

    There is a post making rounds about how a fingerprinting script from Alibaba’s AliExpress interrupted someone’s bluetooth headphone connection. AliExpress was trying trying to discretely track users, but was thwarted by Firefox’s anti-fingerprinting technology.

    4.3K3274724221K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 2026

    WHAT A WIN 😤 🔴⚪ #WxmAFC https://t.co/t6GuBPs9eM

    3.5K1845660148K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 2026

    Good news. @NVIDIAGFN is now officially supported in Firefox on Windows. GeForce NOW members can stream their games directly in Firefox, with no separate app or additional downloads—just sign in, connect your gaming library and start playing https://t.co/jJdXVzg94f https://t.co/uZFOB0164I

    3.1K2425819108K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 2026

    Most people don’t choose their browser. But if you use Firefox, then you did, and that choice deserves to be respected regardless of where you live. 1/4

    2.9K15213920361K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ad

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3.2K interactions against 2.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.152%. Posts are seen about 205K times each, and 1.57% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.71% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.73 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 6 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 33% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 484K interactions, about 159x its own typical post. Only 6 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Firefox's engagement rate on X?
Firefox (@firefox) has an engagement rate of 0.152%, based on the median interactions across 6 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,111,039 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.152%, Firefox sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,078 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @firefox have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @firefox post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going