Back to @film_girl's profile

Christina Warren engagement report

@film_girl - 99K followers on X

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.124%
of 99K followers
Per impression
0.491%
25K views on a typical post
Reach
25.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
123
interactions (median)
Saved
0.036%
9 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.43/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Friday

Early reading. We have captured 7 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 123 interactions against 99K followers, an engagement rate of 0.124%. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 0.491% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 25.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 14% carry an image or video and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 38K interactions, about 309x its own typical post. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.124%, Christina Warren sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.147%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,004 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,390 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video14% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link14% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 14% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 14% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 190 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 5, 2026309x their median

    Tomorrow will be my last day at Google after 27 years, and watching it grow from 25 people to 190,000+ has been an amazing journey. Below is a note I shared with many people internally at Google today. An excerpt is: It has been an absolute pleasure to work with you and to help build some of the most widely used and impactful products of all time. As a kid, I dreamed of helping build software that would be used by many people, and Google now has thirteen products used by more than a billion people (amazing!). Our work has had a tremendous impact in the world, and I have been lucky enough to collaborate and form friendships with many colleagues that I deeply admire, respect, and enjoy. It still brings me joy every time I see people out in the world using our products to find information, handle email, translate documents, watch videos, learn new things, navigate and understand the physical world, browse the web, use their phone, run large-scale computations on our infrastructure, ride in an autonomous vehicle, or perform complex tasks with the help of our AI systems. I hope you all share this sense of joy, because it is a shared accomplishment! Thank you to all of my colleagues at Google over many years! Now I'm excited to go start @DiscoLoopAI with my longtime friends and colleagues @Sanjay_Ghemawat, @OriolVinyalsML, and @quocleix. (Updated post: slightly redacted to not have some personal info)

    34K2.8K84575712M viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 2026244x their median

    duo you want this https://t.co/I2c3aVKMws

    27K1.5K8874831.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 2026146x their median

    Oddly enough the best advertisement I've seen for OLED TVs lol

    17K8163971.5M viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 2026120x their median

    inside you there are two ratios https://t.co/hK1RdsU2eL

    14K424791051.6M viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 202694x their median

    Jean Smart and Hannah Einbinder will reprise Deborah Vance and Ava at a live comedy show at Hollywood's Fonda Theatre. This is the first time Smart and Einbinder have appeared in-character outside of the Emmy-winning HBO Max comedy. The live special is timed to the start of Emmy Phase 2 voting. https://t.co/nDtFS1MRo3

    11K49931515624K viewsView on X
  • Oct 17, 202684x their median

    i don't want to say much about 'you can see everything' because the viewers discovery is so important and i don't want to spoil it, but there's a specific name mentioned 2/3's into the film so unexpected that the entire theater erupted, what an unbelievable movie experience

    9.9K3856177319K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 202651x their median

    Matthew Rhys and Keri Russell cover the latest issue of Variety 📸: Gavin Bond https://t.co/Nd1f1Y77Xu

    5.4K394443622.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202647x their median

    Salary cap? Uh, have you considered acquiring multiple insurance companies and using the policy payments of little old ladies to fund your teams sports bets?

    5.5K27914191K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20263.0x their median

    Qwen3.8-27B is here! 🚀 It's a leap in capabilities for a laptop size model. Requires ~17GB to run locally. Model page: https://t.co/GOxQEOLrdK https://t.co/g06nqgOXdB

    4.8K404128115681K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202642x their median

    There’s a reason why Apple hasn’t shown us any image of picking a call on the iPhone Duo. It just looks so weird and uncomfortable. 😭 https://t.co/KROgx57Rql

    4.3K147650132945K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 123 interactions against 99K followers, an engagement rate of 0.124%. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 0.491% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 25.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 14% carry an image or video and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 38K interactions, about 309x its own typical post. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Christina Warren's engagement rate on X?
Christina Warren (@film_girl) has an engagement rate of 0.124%, based on the median interactions across 7 original posts from the last 30 days against 98,823 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.124%, Christina Warren sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @film_girl have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @film_girl post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going