Back to @fiction_finance's profile

Fiction Finance engagement report

@fiction_finance - 599K followers on X

Measured over 50 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.041%
of 599K followers
Per impression
1.07%
23K views on a typical post
Reach
3.85%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
248
interactions (median)
Saved
0.037%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.97/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 248 interactions against 599K followers, an engagement rate of 0.041%. Measured over 50 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 1.07% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.86% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 50 posts sampled, 40% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 19K interactions, about 130x its own typical post.

Measured over 50 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Fiction Finance's engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 49% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.041%, Fiction Finance sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,078 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.694%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,078 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,460 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.694%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video40% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 40% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 233 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jan 20, 2026130x their median

    JUST IN: Peter Schiff says a US financial crisis worse than 2008 is coming this year. https://t.co/G0WDkSD9HL

    16K1.6K1.1K3221.3M viewsView on X
  • Jan 22, 202636x their median

    JUST IN: Michael Saylor says he's thinking of buying more Bitcoin. https://t.co/eCcIPBb3QG

    4.4K35859138224K viewsView on X
  • Jan 9, 202620x their median

    Don’t be afraid to pivot. So many people just keep waiting for “alt season” they end up missing years of gains in other asset classes. It’s ok to have things besides extremely high risk investments

    2.4K10231936963K viewsView on X
  • Jan 15, 20267.2x their median

    🚨BREAKING: CRYPTO FEAR & GREED INDEX TURNS TO ‘GREED’ FOR FIRST TIME SINCE OCTOBER https://t.co/ePWow5whc9

    8201181291760K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 20263.1x their median

    DOGE JUST GOLDEN CROSSED ON THE DAILY First time in 14 months. Last time, $DOGE ran to $0.30 within weeks. King of memes is coming back 👀 https://t.co/y6Vl5hg1dx

    62382591038K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20263.1x their median

    THIS IS NOT ALT SEASON If you think it is, you've never lived through one. BTC.D is flat $ETH, $SOL and $XRP aren't even at ATH Alt season is checking your portfolio at lunch and it's doubled since breakfast. Last month was only the teaser. THIS. IS. NOT. IT... YET!

    6784837051K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20263.0x their median

    I'm expecting a MAJOR CRASH this UPTOBER Bigger than October 10 Bigger than anything you've seen this cycle. ...for $BTC dominance 😉

    6573246160K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20262.6x their median

    This will be the LAST BIG ALT SEASON - 2017 was the 1st alt season - 2021 was the 2nd alt season - 2026/2027 is the final alt season After that, we get a bear market that lasts years. Good luck everyone 🙌

    5633751346K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20262.6x their median

    It's a bull market. BUY THE DIPS

    5403858531K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20262.6x their median

    ETH is getting ready for MONTHLY BREAKOUT Almost 5 years of compression. The day $ETH closes a month above $4,500... $10,000 is coming 👀 https://t.co/E5P27eeTSV

    5485532239K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 248 interactions against 599K followers, an engagement rate of 0.041%. Measured over 50 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 1.07% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.86% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 50 posts sampled, 40% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 19K interactions, about 130x its own typical post.

What is Fiction Finance's engagement rate on X?
Fiction Finance (@fiction_finance) has an engagement rate of 0.041%, based on the median interactions across 50 original posts from the last 30 days against 598,672 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.041%, Fiction Finance sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,078 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @fiction_finance have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @fiction_finance post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going