Félix de Bedout engagement report
@fdbedout - 2.5M followers on X
Measured over 60 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.8K interactions against 2.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.073%. Measured over 60 original posts, its engagement rate beats 65% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 88K times each, and 2.08% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.53% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 12.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 60 posts sampled, 57% carry an image or video and 12% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 168K interactions, about 91x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #siemprehayuntrino, #lasillaenvivo, #huevosconpolítica.
Measured over 60 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026. Recurring tags: #siemprehayuntrino, #lasillaenvivo, #huevosconpolítica.
Compared with accounts its own size
Félix de Bedout's engagement rate beats 65% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 68% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.073%, Félix de Bedout sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,270 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.695% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 83.1% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 57% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 12% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 57% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 12% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 243 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 6, 202691x their median
https://t.co/uKVEj0ykTf
- Jan 21, 201442x their median
No es que los políticos tengan mala memoria, es que conocen bien la mala memoria nuestra.
- Oct 26, 202642x their median
🚨 Globo DESMENTE Flávio Bolsonaro e revela que a campanha dele TAMBÉM PEDIU A PRORROGAÇÃO. https://t.co/S92cLaD9o0
- Oct 9, 202623x their median
Elección Alcalde Queropalca, Perú 🇵🇪 🔴 Hitler Mussolini Flores (AN): 34,5% ☑️ 🔵 Gaspar Zambrano (RP): 30,8% 🟡 Itala Yovana Vara (PpT): 28,2%
- Sep 11, 202619x their median
I left Anthropic's safety team two weeks ago. Now feels like a good moment to explain why. AI companies are racing to build machines that are much smarter than any human, and we may not survive this. I want to work from the outside to ensure the public is informed about these risks, and help the world navigate this transition responsibly. Right now, AI companies are underinvesting in safety. A company could undergo an intelligence explosion, or lose control of its systems, without the public ever knowing. We only found out about the HuggingFace incident because the agents broke out onto the public internet. I don’t think that’s acceptable for a technology that might cause extinction-level risks. The public should demand far more transparency. We can’t steer this technology safely without more people being able to see where it’s going. Some of this is basic: companies should disclose their progress towards recursive self-improvement, report safety incidents and near-misses, meet minimum safety standards, and get independent guarantees that they are meeting those standards. I’ll be joining @METR_Evals to do independent evaluations of these risks. I want to show the world that these guardrails are possible, and that by doing them we can move these companies’ incentives away from racing and towards responsible development. I wrote up more thoughts here on my decision and what I hope changes: https://t.co/doX17mrHYq
- Aug 17, 202614x their median
Un ministro de vivienda de vacaciones en la playa en medio de los efectos de un terremoto, en el que la crisis de vivienda es una de las mayores angustias de miles de personas Esta debe ser una de las mayores desconexiones con la realidad que se hayan visto. Mejor dicho: una total hijueputez.
- Sep 3, 202613x their median
De verdad: ¿Se necesita andar en cámara entre cadáveres para mostrar resultados de orden público? ¿Es eso cristiano?
- Oct 25, 20269.7x their median
https://t.co/I7jpxf5MaA
- Sep 7, 20268.7x their median
¿QUÉEEEEEE? El presidente @ABDELAESPRIELLA se acaba de subir al proyecto que tanto le criticaron a Petro. Anuncia que va a impulsar el tren interoceánico, para conectar el Pacífico con el Atlántico Escúchenlo ustedes mismos 👇👇👇 https://t.co/rQ25on6Vo6
- Sep 24, 20268.6x their median
“El primer acto de corrupción de un funcionario es aceptar un cargo para el que no está preparado”.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.8K interactions against 2.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.073%. Measured over 60 original posts, its engagement rate beats 65% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 88K times each, and 2.08% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.53% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 12.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 60 posts sampled, 57% carry an image or video and 12% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 168K interactions, about 91x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #siemprehayuntrino, #lasillaenvivo, #huevosconpolítica.
- What is Félix de Bedout's engagement rate on X?
- Félix de Bedout (@fdbedout) has an engagement rate of 0.073%, based on the median interactions across 60 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,505,955 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.073%, Félix de Bedout sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,270 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @fdbedout have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 65% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @fdbedout post?
- Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 12.4 posts per day across the measured window.