Back to @fabigaelle's profile

elleagibaF Choublak uoɹıoqı⅂ engagement report

@fabigaelle - 9.9K followers on X

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.02%
of 9.9K followers
Per impression
0.775%
258 views on a typical post
Reach
2.61%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.6/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 9.9K followers, an engagement rate of 0.02%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 11% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 258 times each, and 0.775% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.61% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 21% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 686 interactions, about 343x its own typical post.

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

elleagibaF Choublak uoɹıoqı⅂'s engagement rate beats 11% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 3 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 26% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.02%, elleagibaF Choublak uoɹıoqı⅂ sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,482 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.696%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,482 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,403 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.696%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video21% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 21% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 100 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 20, 2026343x their median

    Dolce&Gabbana Strap Heel 🌹 https://t.co/YguiMLk5eg

    56597101412K viewsView on X
  • Dec 31, 2015188x their median

    Fais ce que tu crois juste , selon ton cœur , car on te critiquera de toute façon.....

    231125155View on X
  • Aug 25, 202683x their median

    Alix Didier Fils Aimé dòmi byen?

    101193877.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202671x their median

    Bandi viv ansanm yo asasine plis pase yon 50 tèn moun nan komin nan. Stanley Jaccis https://t.co/FjxEo0pxkd

    892162627K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202652x their median

    Bandi ki fè pati kowalisyon Viv Ansanm lanse yon nouvo atak nan plizyè lokalite nan Kenscoff. Plizyè moun mouri, kay boule, anpil fanmi kouri kite zòn nan. Daprè otorite lokal yo, li toujou difisil pou konnen kantite egzak viktim yo, paske gen moun ki disparèt epi aksè nan zòn nan rete konplike. Ekstrè sa a raple kijan vyolans gang yo ap vale Kenskòf, yon komin, lontan, nou te konsidere kòm youn nan dènye espas ki te pi kalm toupre Pòtoprens

    523211810K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202620x their median

    Assassinat d’un employé de la Compagnie des Tabacs Comme Il Faut à Tabarre. Treize personnes ont été interpellées ce jeudi 20 août dans le cadre de l’enquête sur l’assassinat de Mike Galler, citoyen américain et employé de la @commeilfautsa. Il a été tué sur son lieu de travail, à Tabarre. Les circonstances du crime restent à déterminer.

    2635512K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20265.0x their median

    M wè yon piblikasyon Privert ki di “nou te fè l an 2016” Ki sa ki te fèt la e ki nou ki te fè l menm?

    60221.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20263.0x their median

    Gen de jou ou leve nan peyi sa ou pa santi w anlè ni atè. M santi m fa fon sel kout anmwey la telman m elas tchuipsss. Moun pa viv konsa.

    3120363 viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20262.0x their median

    On moun sot mandem si se poutet eleksyon viv ansanm mande anraje konsa. Pandanl di sa vre 🤔 toujou gen masak le pral gen eleksyon men ane sa yo, yo telman pa bann on souf ou pa konn nan ki peryod ou ye alafen... sa nou fè nap peye menm?

    3001407 viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20262.0x their median

    Lafamilia lavim nan men w 🗣️🗣️

    2110288 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 9.9K followers, an engagement rate of 0.02%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 11% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 258 times each, and 0.775% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.61% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 21% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 686 interactions, about 343x its own typical post.

What is elleagibaF Choublak uoɹıoqı⅂'s engagement rate on X?
elleagibaF Choublak uoɹıoqı⅂ (@fabigaelle) has an engagement rate of 0.02%, based on the median interactions across 19 original posts from the last 30 days against 9,886 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.02%, elleagibaF Choublak uoɹıoqı⅂ sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,482 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @fabigaelle have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 11% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @fabigaelle post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going