Fred Krueger engagement report
@dotkrueger - 391K followers on X
Measured over 72 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 164 interactions against 391K followers, an engagement rate of 0.042%. Measured over 72 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 1.19% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 72 posts sampled, 35% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 31% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.5K interactions, about 15x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bitcoin, #economy, #markets.
Measured over 72 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026. Recurring tags: #bitcoin, #economy, #markets.
Compared with accounts its own size
Fred Krueger's engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 52% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.042%, Fred Krueger sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,656 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.697% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.9% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 35% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 31% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 35% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 31% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 123 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 30, 202615x their median
BREAKING: Bitcoin may already be quantum-safe According to peer reviewed new research by Oxford Physicist Tim Palmer, there likely exists a fundamental ceiling of roughly 400 coherently entangled qubits. The latest estimates require at least 835 logical qubits to break Bitcoin’s signatures with Shor’s algorithm. References in comments. Elon Musk and Steve Jurvetson have commented positively on this research.
- Aug 29, 202611x their median
If bitcoin repeats the 2019-21 fractal the next top is $669k in July 2027. $BTC https://t.co/uIOajtGpLk
- Sep 27, 20268.5x their median
You aren’t going to beat Bitcoin over the next 10 years. Useless trying.
- Sep 8, 20268.1x their median
BREAKING: The U.S. is reportedly targeting Iranian oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz, according to a U.S. official cited by i24NEWS. Explosions have been reported near Kharg Island amid reports of U.S. strikes along Iran’s coast. Iran says retaliation is coming within hours, with its forces reportedly preparing to target U.S. aircraft carriers and other American military assets.
- Sep 29, 20267.9x their median
BTCNOW LAUNCHES “PAY-OVER-TIME” BITCOIN PURCHASES WITH 60 MONTHLY PAYMENTS @BTCNowHQ has launched a new model allowing customers to lock in a Bitcoin purchase at today’s price while paying for it over five years. Unlike dollar-cost averaging, the Bitcoin price is fixed when the purchase is made rather than changing with each monthly payment. The company says: • Payments are spread across 60 fixed monthly installments • Bitcoin is held in trust until fully paid • BitGo provides custody • There are no margin calls or forced liquidations from BTC price declines • A U.S.-wide rollout is planned over the coming months The model effectively brings “buy now, pay later” financing to Bitcoin, allowing customers to secure BTC upfront without paying the full purchase amount on day one.
- Aug 30, 20267.2x their median
Bitcoin will be widely used as a means of exchange. AFTER it hits 5 Million per coin. You can wait for this before you invest, but you will basically miss the entire move.
- Sep 27, 20267.0x their median
A simplified Bitcoin flow model: It takes roughly 300,000 BTC of net buying to double the price. Symmetrically, roughly 300,000 BTC of net selling cuts the price in half. That’s the model. Bull market: Bitcoin went from roughly $30K when the ETF was announced to about $120K — a 4x. Estimated institutional buying: ~1.2M BTC Exceptional OG selling: ~600K BTC Net buying: ~600K BTC 600K net buying = two doublings. $30K → $60K → $120K. Bear market: Bitcoin went from roughly $120K to $60K. Exceptional OG selling: ~600K BTC Saylor/Strategy buying: ~300K BTC Net selling: ~300K BTC One halving. $120K → $60K. Simple model. Surprisingly good fit.
- Aug 30, 20266.3x their median
WHY BITCOIN PRICE MODELS KEEP FOOLING SMART PEOPLE A public service announcement as we head into the Bitcoin bull market
- Sep 10, 20265.7x their median
We're getting an interest rate hike next week, $110 oil and 5% 10yr notes. Have a nice day. https://t.co/FIYkZ4Zegy
- Sep 9, 20265.5x their median
In a world where the US just destroyed 5 Iranian Tankers, declared "we are the house" to the Bond Market, and effectively has stopped trade with Canada... Bitcoin is the RISK OFF asset.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 164 interactions against 391K followers, an engagement rate of 0.042%. Measured over 72 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 1.19% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 72 posts sampled, 35% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 31% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.5K interactions, about 15x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bitcoin, #economy, #markets.
- What is Fred Krueger's engagement rate on X?
- Fred Krueger (@dotkrueger) has an engagement rate of 0.042%, based on the median interactions across 72 original posts from the last 30 days against 390,580 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.042%, Fred Krueger sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,656 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @dotkrueger have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @dotkrueger post?
- Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.67 posts per day across the measured window.