Back to @darkside_dipe's profile

DarkeningP engagement report

@darkside_dipe - 85K followers on X

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 13, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
1.41%
of 85K followers
Per impression
5.43%
19K views on a typical post
Reach
25.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.0K
interactions (median)
Saved
1.07%
204 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.67/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 85K followers, an engagement rate of 1.41%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 5.43% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 22.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 21x its own typical post.

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 13, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

DarkeningP's engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 86% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.41%, DarkeningP sits above the 75th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.698% to 2.61%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,098 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,393 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video90% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 90% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 82 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 9, 202321x their median

    แตกจนได้คับ 🤤💦 คืนนี้นอนฝันดีค้าบ ปลดปล่อยละ 😮‍💨 https://t.co/O7IxAy5FDr

    15K6.3K352501.7M viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 202613x their median

    ควยๆน้อยๆ แต่อยากลอง 56 คับ 😁😁💦💦💦 ลองจนน้ำแตกเลย https://t.co/KW6wdJqVhJ

    12K1.6K294301K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20268.1x their median

    เชี่ย คาวๆ ข้นๆ เลยครับ 🤤🤤💦💦💦💦🍆🍆🍆 https://t.co/NWotKpKjoN

    6.7K1.6K31879K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20268.1x their median

    เชี่ย น้ำเมือกไหลเลย 🤤🤤🤤💦💦💦💦🍆 https://t.co/wNygn4rl6G

    6.6K1.7K45787K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20267.4x their median

    เวลาเงี่ยนจัด ควยแข็งสุดๆ ลองถุง 56 มันแน่นเกินคับ เจ็บ ว่าวไม่ได้ 😁😛 สงสัยต้องไป 58 https://t.co/QRNL4rbZ84

    7.1K499164284K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20263.0x their median

    อั้นไม่ไหวคับ แตกยืดเป็นสายเลย 🍆🍆💦💦💦💦💦💦🤤🤤 https://t.co/qMIskrYN9p

    2.5K56813338K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20261.9x their median

    อยากแตกใน ☔️☔️☔️ อัดให้ล้นรูเลยคับ 🤤🤤🤤 https://t.co/iNPOpwTAur

    1.5K38527428K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20261.6x their median

    ลองใส่ถุงกล่องม่วง 60 ให้ดูแล้วค้าบ —> hilight —> ปั่นควยแข็ง —>ฉีกถุง —> รูดใส่ควย —>ว่าว แตกในถุงจะๆ คับ 🥺🥺🍆🍆💦💦💦💦 https://t.co/ZR2NhOwnuS

    1.4K31510232K viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 20261.6x their median

    แตกเลยว่ะ ไม่ได้ตั้งใจ แต่ทนเสียวไม่ไหว 💦💦💦💦🍆 https://t.co/vY3DE8ZWf0

    1.3K29916127K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20261.5x their median

    ถึงจะหำน้อยแต่ก็ขี้เงี่ยนคับ 😛 พ่อให้มาเท่านี้ก็ต้องทำใจคับ 🫡🍆💦💦💦💦💦💦 เสียวๆ แตกข้นๆ 🤤 https://t.co/4ZuqcHQN5R

    1.3K27016224K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 85K followers, an engagement rate of 1.41%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 5.43% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 22.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 21x its own typical post.

What is DarkeningP's engagement rate on X?
DarkeningP (@darkside_dipe) has an engagement rate of 1.41%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 85,391 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.41%, DarkeningP sits above the 75th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @darkside_dipe have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @darkside_dipe post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going