Chuck Woolery Tribute engagement report
@chuckwoolery - 674K followers on X
Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 807 interactions against 674K followers, an engagement rate of 0.119%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 73% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 3.25% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.68% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 5% carry an image or video and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 97K interactions, about 120x its own typical post.
Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Chuck Woolery Tribute's engagement rate beats 73% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 80% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.119%, Chuck Woolery Tribute sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,349 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.696% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 83.1% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 5% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 5% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 5% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 5% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 493 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 22, 2026120x their median
Why is it that actual human jobs like baker, florist, teacher, and childcare worker barely pay a livable wage, while fake jobs like AI specialist bootlicker, marketing campaign parasite, and synergy consultant are pulling six figures?
- Sep 21, 202670x their median
When Hitler became the Chancellor of Germany in 1933 the first thing he did was to ban the press. Sounds familiar.
- Aug 15, 202659x their median
STOP TELLING BROKE PEOPLE TO BUDGET. THERE, I SAID IT. YOU CAN'T BUDGET YOUR WAY OUT OF POVERTY. AFTER BASIC NECESSITIES I HAVE $0 LEFT OVER, HOW AM I SUPPOSED TO BUDGET?
- Aug 26, 202654x their median
🚨 BREAKING: American rapper Eminem: "The recently released Epstein files are horrifying. This man should be in prison, not the White House." https://t.co/DdAx3tkIuy
- Aug 31, 202639x their median
Anonymous megadonors have spent over $1 billion to buy the 2026 election. Elon Musk has spent over $90 million. Billionaires buying elections is not democracy—it's oligarchy. ENOUGH. We need to end Citizens United, get super PACs out of primaries & publicly fund elections.
- Aug 21, 202623x their median
Just a reminder - This soulless bitch knew everything Trump and Epstein were doing. She knew about the children being r*ped and tortured… She did nothing to prevent it. She’s pure fucking evil.
- Sep 28, 202621x their median
Rich people send their kids to $60,000/year private schools, then vote to defund public education. They don't want school choice, they want their kids separated from yours. Segregation is the goal. "Choice" is the language.
- Aug 15, 202615x their median
Wow. I've never seen an Attorney General and an FBI Director at a presidential rally in all of American history. It violates all kinds of constitutional principles. https://t.co/vUv28anHIS
- Sep 17, 202612x their median
GENUINELY NEED SOMEONE TO WALK ME THROUGH THIS My homeowners insurance jumped from $1,850 a year to $2,290. That's a 24% increase. Zero claims filed. Not one, in six years with the same company. Called to ask why. Rep pulled up my account, confirmed clean history, then said the increase reflects regional risk trends tied to storm activity and rebuilding costs across the state, not anything specific to my policy. So I asked directly. Did anything happen to my house. She said no. I'm paying $440 more a year for events that happened to other people's houses, in other parts of the state, that I have no connection to and never filed a claim over. That's not really insurance based on my behavior at that point. That's a regional tax with my name quietly attached to the bill.
- Sep 22, 202612x their median
“We can’t tax rich people on unrealized stock gains because they haven’t actually made the money until they sell.” Okay. Then why does my property tax bill keep rising when my house increases in value? I didn’t sell it. I didn’t cash out. I didn’t put that appreciation in my bank account. But I’m still paying more every year because the house is supposedly worth more on paper. Funny how “unrealized gains aren’t real money” gets complicated depending on whose gains we’re talking about.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 807 interactions against 674K followers, an engagement rate of 0.119%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 73% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 3.25% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.68% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 5% carry an image or video and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 97K interactions, about 120x its own typical post.
- What is Chuck Woolery Tribute's engagement rate on X?
- Chuck Woolery Tribute (@chuckwoolery) has an engagement rate of 0.119%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 673,609 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.119%, Chuck Woolery Tribute sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,349 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @chuckwoolery have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 73% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @chuckwoolery post?
- Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.03 posts per day across the measured window.