Back to @cgtnenespanol's profile

CGTN Español engagement report

@cgtnenespanol - 561K followers on X

Measured over 99 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 561K followers
Per impression
0%
474 views on a typical post
Reach
0.08%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
0
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.3/day
active 7% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 561K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 99 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 474 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.084% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 99 posts sampled, 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9 interactions. Recurring topics include #xw, #china, #políticachina.

Measured over 99 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026. Recurring tags: #xw, #china, #políticachina.

Compared with accounts its own size

CGTN Español's engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 0% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0%, CGTN Español sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,567 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.696%
p902.61%
p9982.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,567 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,364 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.696%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video2% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link15% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 2% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 15% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 184 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 23, 2026

    EN DIRECTO: Sigue la segunda jornada de los II Juegos Mundiales de Robots Humanoides. #RobotsHumanoides #China #CTI #TecnologíaChina #xw https://t.co/4JhOy7mWa2

    61021.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026

    RUSSIAN DEFENCE MINISTRY: RUSSIAN FORCES HIT ONE CARGO VESSEL IN IZMAIL PORT

    32002.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026

    El Tratado de Libre Comercio (TLC) firmado entre #HongKong de China y Perú entrará en vigor el próximo 1 de septiembre, anunció el 25 de agosto el Gobierno de la Región Administrativa Especial de Hong Kong (RAEHK). #China #EconomíaChina #Perú #Biz https://t.co/96oF0PQAfw

    3200454 viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 2026

    Axios, citando a funcionarios estadounidenses: el ataque contra Kohstak tenía como objetivo una torre de telecomunicaciones utilizada con fines civiles y militares

    30101.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026

    EL FMI APROBÓ HOY UN ACUERDO SUCESOR DE DOS AÑOS PARA CHILE BAJO LA LÍNEA DE CRÉDITO FLEXIBLE (FCL), POR UN MONTO DE APROXIMADAMENTE US$11.8 MIL MILLONES

    21101.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 2026

    BONNIE GREER PLAYWRIGHT AND NOVELIST DIES AGE 77

    2100281 viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 2026

    Canciller chino dice que visitas de Xi Jinping a Kirguistán y Egipto se enfocaron en la solidaridad y la cooperación. #China #XiJinping #OCS #Kirguistán #Egipto #WangYi #xw https://t.co/1e0LueF1TW

    2010494 viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 2026

    Estados Unidos quiere incorporar buques de guerra extranjeros a su Armada. Japón espera ser elegido - SCMP

    1200713 viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 2026

    Según fuentes citadas por «The Wall Street Journal»: Ucrania planea intensificar la presencia de sus manifestaciones cerca de los aeropuertos rusos para obligarlos a cerrar

    21001.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026

    URGENTE: Nueve muertos en un ataque ucraniano a un autobús en territorio ocupado (autoridades instaladas por Moscú)

    3000621 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#xw#china#políticachina#chinaalc#asean

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 561K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 99 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 474 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.084% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 99 posts sampled, 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9 interactions. Recurring topics include #xw, #china, #políticachina.

What is CGTN Español's engagement rate on X?
CGTN Español (@cgtnenespanol) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 99 original posts from the last 30 days against 560,981 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0%, CGTN Español sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,567 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @cgtnenespanol have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @cgtnenespanol post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going