Back to @cbouzy's profile

Christopher Bouzy (spoutible.com/cbouzy) engagement report

@cbouzy - 298K followers on X

Measured over 5 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 18, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.266%
of 298K followers
Per impression
1.06%
75K views on a typical post
Reach
25.0%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
795
interactions (median)
Saved
0.024%
18 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.97/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Thursday

Early reading. We have captured 5 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 795 interactions against 298K followers, an engagement rate of 0.266%. Posts are seen about 75K times each, and 1.06% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 25.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.97 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 5 posts sampled, 40% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 57K interactions, about 71x its own typical post. Only 5 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 5 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 18, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.266%, Christopher Bouzy (spoutible.com/cbouzy) sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,270 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.146% to 0.695%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.695%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,270 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,455 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.695%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video40% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 40% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 175 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 6, 202671x their median

    The President of the United States calling on our enemies to take out an American city is treason.

    48K7.3K9301701.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20268.4x their median

    Y'all love calling our Black queens ghetto/black bitches while y'all are aging in banana years. Focus less on Black women and more on your rapidly approaching sell by date.

    5.7K8481213976K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20266.9x their median

    Y’all need to stop the bullshit. Everyone over the age of 10 knows exactly what it means when someone calls a Black person a monkey. It’s racist. Full stop. Stop insulting everyone’s intelligence by pretending otherwise.

    4.9K55245657K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20265.3x their median

    Jasmine Crockett is an elected official who used congressional resources to honor a man with a long history of abuse. How someone’s family voted — something they ultimately don’t have control over — is completely irrelevant to whether that egregious conduct should be called out. https://t.co/O8rWaWu0E5

    3.9K2396023126K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20263.2x their median

    People say I seem angrier these days. Correct. An unnecessary war, troops are serving in awful conditions, longtime residents are being ripped from their families, and tariffs are kneecapping the economy. You unserious single-issue clowns fucked us all and accomplished nothing.

    2.2K31946744K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.6x their median

    The antisemitism festering on parts of the left will not stop with Jews. Black Americans should pay attention. Many of these loud antisemites are anti-Black too. The masks are slipping.

    1.5K2473264958K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20262.4x their median

    Abrams, Harris, and now Crockett. I am tired of the political culture that loves Black women as soldiers and resents them as generals. If you want your candidate to win in Nov, then stop treating democracy like a group project that Black women are supposed to finish alone.

    1.4K3271161839K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20262.1x their median

    Jasmine Crockett oversells her limited influence. Talarico will get over 80% of the Black vote. Instead of saying she'd support the Democratic ticket from top to bottom, she hedges. This is narcissism on display and a give to Paxton. Thanks Jas! https://t.co/VWJW6SIoIF

    1.4K114992199K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 2026

    White people are so damn exhausting. Y’all stay sticking your noses in Black people’s business while living in glass houses. Instead of lecturing Crockett over Chris Brown, go lecture your mother, father, Meemaw, and Pepaw for voting for the rapist in the White House THREE times.

    87513337768K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 2026

    Y’all only remember James Talarico exists when Jasmine Crockett is asked if she’ll campaign with him. Asked and answered. If he needs Jasmine Crockett to drag his ass across the finish line, then he never should’ve been the fucking nominee. https://t.co/RLyWgRribe

    465784313073K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 795 interactions against 298K followers, an engagement rate of 0.266%. Posts are seen about 75K times each, and 1.06% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 25.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.97 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 5 posts sampled, 40% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 57K interactions, about 71x its own typical post. Only 5 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Christopher Bouzy (spoutible.com/cbouzy)'s engagement rate on X?
Christopher Bouzy (spoutible.com/cbouzy) (@cbouzy) has an engagement rate of 0.266%, based on the median interactions across 5 original posts from the last 30 days against 298,426 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.266%, Christopher Bouzy (spoutible.com/cbouzy) sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,270 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @cbouzy have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @cbouzy post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going