Back to @c9ttt's profile

باتمانة engagement report

@c9ttt - 279K followers on X

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.013%
of 279K followers
Per impression
0.103%
36K views on a typical post
Reach
12.8%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
36
interactions (median)
Saved
0.055%
20 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.7/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
05:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 36 interactions against 279K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 27% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 36K times each, and 0.103% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.7 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video and 21% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.1K interactions, about 30x its own typical post.

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

باتمانة's engagement rate beats 27% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 6% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.013%, باتمانة sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,186 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,186 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,400 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video64% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 64% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 186 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 4, 202630x their median

    قلت للنجّار يسوي لي هالدولاب، وهذا اللي طلع لي بالنهاية 😅 أستلمه كذا ولا أرجعه ؟ https://t.co/nEJi7jdmRj

    922331081578K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20269.9x their median

    وش الفرق بين اللهب الأزرق والأحمر في موقد الغاز ؟ https://t.co/lI72aOdod6

    30413372251K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 20268.3x their median

    كمُعلمة، شيء أتمنى كل أم تعرفه: https://t.co/D2ibRJxQbo

    264302154K viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 20264.2x their median

    في تنزانيا، انرصد بالكاميرا قتال بين زرافتين ذكور، على أحقية التزاوج وفرض السيطرة. صاروا يتضاربون بأرقابهم الطويلة، ويلوّحون فيها على بعض بقوة. ومع الضربات، طاحت وحدة منهم على الأرض وأغمى عليها… والثانية وقفت عند راسها تنتظرها. https://t.co/tNUaArmeBt

    142800100K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20261.9x their median

    قبل وفاة أبوي بيومين، كنت ماسك يده. كان عمره ٨٤ سنة، وكان طول عمره رجال شديد وما يعرف يعبر كثير. قلت له: "يا أبوي، عمرك ما قلت لي أحبك." ومن وراء قناع الأكسجين سألني:

    55132070K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 20261.9x their median

    هالصورة من سنة ١٩٩٠، لكن فيها شيء غلط… تقدرون تلاحظونه؟ 🧐 https://t.co/5PE9CYenNm

    48218063K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20261.6x their median

    زوجتي فقدت ذاكرتها قبل ٤ سنوات. أنا وولدي أخذناها لطبيب أعصاب، وأثناء الكشف طلع ولدي شوي يرد على اتصال. وقتها الدكتور قرب مني وقال بصوت منخفض: «خل زوجتك بعيدة عن ولدك.» انصدمت وما فهمت وش يقصد. بعد شوي رجع ولدي ومعه علبة دواء بيده، ويوم شافها الدكتور تغير وجهه...

    32234065K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 20261.6x their median

    وقفت نحلة على رجلي وخلّت نقطة سائل صغيرة جدًا. حسبتها عسل ولحستها، لكن طلع طعمها سيئ جدًا. وش ممكن تكون النحلة تركت على رجلي بالضبط؟ https://t.co/02RggQTct7

    38713065K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 2026

    من الخاص : أمس زوجي كان مسافر شغل. لما رجع، كنت بأحط جاكيته في الغسالة، ولقيت هذا في جيبه. أحد يعرف وش هذا يقدر يساعدني ؟ https://t.co/0nmwTKUXiK

    26417159K viewsView on X
  • Oct 18, 2026

    بنت خالي عمرها ٤٠.. وطول عمرها رافضة الزواج وهي مركزة في شغلها بس السنة هذي قالت: ودي يكون عندي طفل قبل يفوت الوقت وجاها رجال عمره ٤٧ وعنده ولدين من زواج قبل.. وأقنعها إنه يبي يبدأ معها من جديد الأهل تعارفوا.. وصارت الخطبة.. والكل فرحان لها وفجأة كل شي انتهى والسبب ما كان أحد متوقعه ....

    31132061K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 36 interactions against 279K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 27% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 36K times each, and 0.103% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.7 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video and 21% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.1K interactions, about 30x its own typical post.

What is باتمانة's engagement rate on X?
باتمانة (@c9ttt) has an engagement rate of 0.013%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 278,794 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.013%, باتمانة sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,186 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @c9ttt have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 27% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @c9ttt post?
Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.7 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going