Back to @bubblebratz's profile

Madelynn May engagement report

@bubblebratz - 1.0M followers on X

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.644%
of 1.0M followers
Per impression
6.20%
109K views on a typical post
Reach
10.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
6.7K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.968%
1.1K bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.53/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 6.7K interactions against 1.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.644%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 94% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 109K times each, and 6.20% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video and 85% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 3.0x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bbc, #brat, #chudai.

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026. Recurring tags: #bbc, #brat, #chudai.

Compared with accounts its own size

Madelynn May's engagement rate beats 94% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 93% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.644%, Madelynn May sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,270 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.146% to 0.695%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.695%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,270 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,455 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.695%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video97% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 97% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 76 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 1, 20263.0x their median

    Let me see those phone wallpapers boysssss 🤪 https://t.co/eiSvZrjCPQ

    19K775662213K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20262.3x their median

    Morning, can I get a ride? https://t.co/NvOuZvjQHJ

    15K574643202K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20262.3x their median

    Oops did I cut the video off before the good part? 😬 https://t.co/23Dl1x5kr8

    15K796425231K viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 20262.3x their median

    Little fuck toy at your service 🫡 @girthmasterr https://t.co/0wQxNHLDQQ

    15K726253225K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20262.3x their median

    Whoops they fell out 🤪 https://t.co/JOOjhSc6En

    15K640511155K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20262.2x their median

    These need a face buried in them rn https://t.co/pMwcQHlIIM

    14K630923206K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 20262.1x their median

    Would you cum to a sleepover with us 🍭😋 @bunnycritterr https://t.co/fr9auCCScb

    13K604421219K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20262.1x their median

    I just love being a good little cum slut 🥹 https://t.co/wkXXhbQZiH

    13K583431245K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20262.0x their median

    How many times did you cum to me this weekend? 😋 https://t.co/rGpzAY9dRH

    13K489931153K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20262.0x their median

    Do your tits hang low? Do they bounce and slap real slow? Can you motorboat the pair? Can you shove your face in there? Can you throw them o’er your shoulder While he rails you even harder? Do your tits hang low? https://t.co/PtVCG2L8zI

    13K603511194K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#bbc#brat#chudai#cocktribute#cumtribute

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 6.7K interactions against 1.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.644%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 94% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 109K times each, and 6.20% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video and 85% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 3.0x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bbc, #brat, #chudai.

What is Madelynn May's engagement rate on X?
Madelynn May (@bubblebratz) has an engagement rate of 0.644%, based on the median interactions across 39 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,045,595 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.644%, Madelynn May sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,270 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @bubblebratz have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 94% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @bubblebratz post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going