Brandi Love ® engagement report
@brandi_love - 1.2M followers on X
Measured over 100 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 2.0K interactions against 1.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.16%. Measured over 100 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 56K times each, and 3.53% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.52% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 10.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 100 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video, 16% are part of a thread and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 71K interactions, about 11x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #goblue, #afterthehalf, #florida.
Measured over 100 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026. Recurring tags: #goblue, #afterthehalf, #florida.
Compared with accounts its own size
Brandi Love ®'s engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 82% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.16%, Brandi Love ® sits above the 50th percentile of the 211,975 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.146% to 0.694%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.694% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 83.1% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 85% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 15% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 85% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 15% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 119 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Apr 30, 202611x their median
I am introducing a Constitutional Amendment to end Birthright Citizenship. Under current interpretations of American law, anyone born on American soil automatically becomes a U.S. citizen, regardless of whether the parent was here legally or not. This is wrong and not at all the intent of those who wrote the 14th Amendment. We are a country filled with immigrants, and legal immigration is valuable and should be protected. But we are also a country whose borders have been too open and our generosity exploited too often. President Trump has moved to seal our border from illegal immigrants more than any other president. But we will have more to do. We need to make sure that only children born to legal residents of the U.S. are automatically citizens. I have supported protecting birthright citizenship from abuse since the beginning of my tenure in the Senate, when I cosponsored the Birthright Citizenship Act of 2011, and now I am proposing an amendment to protect United States citizenship in case the Supreme Court fails to address this issue correctly.
- Jun 30, 202613x their median
"My child was born in the Shire. It's a Hobbit." https://t.co/dbTd23qQkl
- Sep 17, 202632x their median
"NASA Mars'tan uzay görüntülerini paylaştı." https://t.co/IWCaGUuHVt
- Oct 18, 202628x their median
Ceux qui ont cherché à faire tomber la République auront à en répondre. https://t.co/qtqKUIXPpu
- Jun 30, 202610x their median
Our Founding Fathers would have started a second revolution by now.
- Oct 5, 202621x their median
NOW: Thousands march through Cornell University campus, demanding Justice for Jane Doe and "Tear Down the Fkn Frats!" https://t.co/es7v60IIFU
- Oct 19, 202616x their median
I think we can all agree now that the Cornell 7 was a hoax and they tried to start another MeToo movement and it flopped massively.
- Oct 21, 202615x their median
61% of illegal alien households use at least one major welfare program.
- Aug 31, 202612x their median
Too hot for your timeline or just right? https://t.co/wyitI1QRnW
- Sep 8, 202611x their median
I think someone’s weakness is right here… 👀 https://t.co/QZbOmXijPa
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 2.0K interactions against 1.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.16%. Measured over 100 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 56K times each, and 3.53% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.52% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 10.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 100 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video, 16% are part of a thread and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 71K interactions, about 11x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #goblue, #afterthehalf, #florida.
- What is Brandi Love ®'s engagement rate on X?
- Brandi Love ® (@brandi_love) has an engagement rate of 0.16%, based on the median interactions across 100 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,230,329 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.16%, Brandi Love ® sits above the 50th percentile of the 211,975 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @brandi_love have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @brandi_love post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 10.7 posts per day across the measured window.