Back to @blackhawkce457's profile

J πŸŽ™οΈ engagement report

@blackhawkce457 - 101K followers on X

Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.183%
of 101K followers
Per impression
7.56%
2.4K views on a typical post
Reach
2.42%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
185
interactions (median)
Saved
0.082%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.17/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 185 interactions against 101K followers, an engagement rate of 0.183%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 62% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.4K times each, and 7.56% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.42% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 66% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.8K interactions, about 15x its own typical post.

Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

J πŸŽ™οΈ's engagement rate beats 62% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 93% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.183%, J πŸŽ™οΈ sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,656 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.146% to 0.697%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.697%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,656 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,418 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.697%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video66% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 66% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 85 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 11, 202615x their median

    If bacon and eggs scare you more than the cereal and oatmeal you’re eating, you’re not ready for this conversation. MAHA

    2.5K2221061028K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 20264.8x their median

    Republicans: Most are spineless. Democrats: The reason everything's on fire. One makes me mad. The other's burns the entire house down. VOTE ACCORDINGLY THIS NOVEMBER. VOTE RED! πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

    643175621510K viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 20264.1x their median

    Sydney Sweeney without makeup vs. Taylor Swift: https://t.co/9QaDSyl035

    6542777656K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 20263.3x their median

    I voted to execute Terrorist by firing squad on Dec. 3 2026 at Fort Hood by Firing Squad! πŸ«΄πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

    533542218.0K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20263.0x their median

    I’m surprised an Obama appointed judge isn’t blocking the execution of Nidal Hassan yet. Seems like something they would do.

    3833213145.2K viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 20262.8x their median

    Talarico's CNN Town Hall appearance did nothing to help him in Texas. It was a freak show, with freaks planted by CNN to ask the dumbest questions to try make that garbage look normal. That crap wasn't normal, it was insanity on parade! Ken Paxton will win by 10 points!

    417882015.5K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20262.6x their median

    Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. Her insurance company is gonna love this little gem as she pays for that window and they raise her rates πŸ˜‚ https://t.co/mdIpSCa427

    350725786.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20252.2x their median

    Who is Ilhan Omar’s father, and why does it matter? Omar's father, Nur Omar Mohamed, was a colonel in Siad Barre's Somali army during the 1970s-80s Ogaden War. Barre's regime aligned with the Soviet Union, adopting Marxist-Leninist "scientific socialism." Mohamed served under Barre during the 1987-89 Isaaq genocide in Somaliland, killing an estimated 50-200,000 Isaaqs. This history raises questions about Omar's family ties to authoritarianism and mass atrocities. #Somalia

    244119331824K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20261.8x their median

    The road just isn’t enough for some people https://t.co/Pte8NBXQ2q

    23727591123K viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 2026

    Bed was never an option: https://t.co/nPFB5vETaH

    2461711227K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 185 interactions against 101K followers, an engagement rate of 0.183%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 62% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.4K times each, and 7.56% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.42% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 66% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.8K interactions, about 15x its own typical post.

What is J πŸŽ™οΈ's engagement rate on X?
J πŸŽ™οΈ (@blackhawkce457) has an engagement rate of 0.183%, based on the median interactions across 32 original posts from the last 30 days against 101,163 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.183%, J πŸŽ™οΈ sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,656 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @blackhawkce457 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 62% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @blackhawkce457 post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going